cpufreq: CPPC: Force reporting values in KHz to fix user space interface

When CPPC is being used by ACPI on arm64, user space tools such as
cpupower report CPU frequency values from sysfs that are incorrect.

What the driver was doing was reporting the values given by ACPI tables
in whatever scale was used to provide them.  However, the ACPI spec
defines the CPPC values as unitless abstract numbers.  Internal kernel
structures such as struct perf_cap, in contrast, expect these values
to be in KHz.  When these struct values get reported via sysfs, the
user space tools also assume they are in KHz, causing them to report
incorrect values (for example, reporting a CPU frequency of 1MHz when
it should be 1.8GHz).

The downside is that this approach has some assumptions:

   (1) It relies on SMBIOS3 being used, *and* that the Max Frequency
   value for a processor is set to a non-zero value.

   (2) It assumes that all processors run at the same speed, or that
   the CPPC values have all been scaled to reflect relative speed.
   This patch retrieves the largest CPU Max Frequency from a type 4 DMI
   record that it can find.  This may not be an issue, however, as a
   sampling of DMI data on x86 and arm64 indicates there is often only
   one such record regardless.  Since CPPC is relatively new, it is
   unclear if the ACPI ASL will always be written to reflect any sort
   of relative performance of processors of differing speeds.

   (3) It assumes that performance and frequency both scale linearly.

For arm64 servers, this may be sufficient, but it does rely on
firmware values being set correctly.  Hence, other approaches will
be considered in the future.

This has been tested on three arm64 servers, with and without DMI, with
and without CPPC support.

Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

1 files changed, 49 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
index 8882b8e2ecd0..6debc189a9c9 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
@@ -19,10 +19,19 @@
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
+#include <linux/dmi.h>
 #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
 
+#include <asm/unaligned.h>
+
 #include <acpi/cppc_acpi.h>
 
+/* Minimum struct length needed for the DMI processor entry we want */
+#define DMI_ENTRY_PROCESSOR_MIN_LENGTH	48
+
+/* Offest in the DMI processor structure for the max frequency */
+#define DMI_PROCESSOR_MAX_SPEED  0x14
+
 /*
  * These structs contain information parsed from per CPU
  * ACPI _CPC structures.
@@ -32,6 +41,39 @@
  */
 static struct cpudata **all_cpu_data;
 
+/* Capture the max KHz from DMI */
+static u64 cppc_dmi_max_khz;
+
+/* Callback function used to retrieve the max frequency from DMI */
+static void cppc_find_dmi_mhz(const struct dmi_header *dm, void *private)
+{
+	const u8 *dmi_data = (const u8 *)dm;
+	u16 *mhz = (u16 *)private;
+
+	if (dm->type == DMI_ENTRY_PROCESSOR &&
+	    dm->length >= DMI_ENTRY_PROCESSOR_MIN_LENGTH) {
+		u16 val = (u16)get_unaligned((const u16 *)
+				(dmi_data + DMI_PROCESSOR_MAX_SPEED));
+		*mhz = val > *mhz ? val : *mhz;
+	}
+}
+
+/* Look up the max frequency in DMI */
+static u64 cppc_get_dmi_max_khz(void)
+{
+	u16 mhz = 0;
+
+	dmi_walk(cppc_find_dmi_mhz, &mhz);
+
+	/*
+	 * Real stupid fallback value, just in case there is no
+	 * actual value set.
+	 */
+	mhz = mhz ? mhz : 1;
+
+	return (1000 * mhz);
+}
+
 static int cppc_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 		unsigned int target_freq,
 		unsigned int relation)
@@ -42,7 +84,7 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 
 	cpu = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu];
 
-	cpu->perf_ctrls.desired_perf = target_freq;
+	cpu->perf_ctrls.desired_perf = target_freq * policy->max / cppc_dmi_max_khz;
 	freqs.old = policy->cur;
 	freqs.new = target_freq;
 
@@ -94,8 +136,10 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	policy->min = cpu->perf_caps.lowest_perf;
-	policy->max = cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf;
+	cppc_dmi_max_khz = cppc_get_dmi_max_khz();
+
+	policy->min = cpu->perf_caps.lowest_perf * cppc_dmi_max_khz / cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf;
+	policy->max = cppc_dmi_max_khz;
 	policy->cpuinfo.min_freq = policy->min;
 	policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = policy->max;
 	policy->shared_type = cpu->shared_type;
@@ -112,7 +156,8 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	cpu->cur_policy = policy;
 
 	/* Set policy->cur to max now. The governors will adjust later. */
-	policy->cur = cpu->perf_ctrls.desired_perf = cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf;
+	policy->cur = cppc_dmi_max_khz;
+	cpu->perf_ctrls.desired_perf = cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf;
 
 	ret = cppc_set_perf(cpu_num, &cpu->perf_ctrls);
 	if (ret)