diff options
author | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> | 2018-02-22 06:59:44 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2018-02-27 18:22:12 +0100 |
commit | d417e0691ac00d35c4e6b90fc3fc85631a7865ad (patch) | |
tree | f335e4959da76cd7c61542d928e72c31b68dd574 /drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | |
parent | cpufreq: Reorder cpufreq_online() error code path (diff) | |
download | linux-d417e0691ac00d35c4e6b90fc3fc85631a7865ad.tar.xz linux-d417e0691ac00d35c4e6b90fc3fc85631a7865ad.zip |
cpufreq: Validate frequency table in the core
By design, cpufreq drivers are responsible for calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() from their ->init()
callbacks to validate the frequency table.
However, if a cpufreq driver is buggy and fails to do so properly, it
lead to unexpected behavior of the driver or the cpufreq core at a
later point in time. It would be better if the core could
validate the frequency table during driver initialization.
To that end, introduce cpufreq_table_validate_and_sort() and make
the cpufreq core call it right after invoking the ->init() callback
of the driver and destroy the cpufreq policy if the table is invalid.
For the time being the validation of the table happens twice, once
from the driver and then from the core. The individual drivers will
be updated separately to drop table validation if they don't need it
for other reasons.
The frequency table is marked "sorted" or "unsorted" by the new helper
now instead of in cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(), as it should only
be done after validating the table (which the drivers won't do going
forward).
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Subject/changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 13 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 8814c572e263..239063fb6afc 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -1219,6 +1219,10 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu) goto out_free_policy; } + ret = cpufreq_table_validate_and_sort(policy); + if (ret) + goto out_exit_policy; + down_write(&policy->rwsem); if (new_policy) { @@ -1249,7 +1253,7 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu) policy->cur = cpufreq_driver->get(policy->cpu); if (!policy->cur) { pr_err("%s: ->get() failed\n", __func__); - goto out_exit_policy; + goto out_destroy_policy; } } @@ -1296,7 +1300,7 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu) if (new_policy) { ret = cpufreq_add_dev_interface(policy); if (ret) - goto out_exit_policy; + goto out_destroy_policy; cpufreq_stats_create_table(policy); @@ -1311,7 +1315,7 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu) __func__, cpu, ret); /* cpufreq_policy_free() will notify based on this */ new_policy = false; - goto out_exit_policy; + goto out_destroy_policy; } up_write(&policy->rwsem); @@ -1326,12 +1330,13 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu) return 0; -out_exit_policy: +out_destroy_policy: for_each_cpu(j, policy->real_cpus) remove_cpu_dev_symlink(policy, get_cpu_device(j)); up_write(&policy->rwsem); +out_exit_policy: if (cpufreq_driver->exit) cpufreq_driver->exit(policy); |