summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAaron Plattner <aplattner@nvidia.com>2014-06-18 20:27:32 +0200
committerRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>2014-06-18 21:52:20 +0200
commitfefa8ff810c5ab4c4206aed9d159c4d6fe8d4f1c (patch)
tree6118b6695bc29d4bad0a0cdb36ee295903574711 /drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
parentintel_pstate: Correct rounding in busy calculation (diff)
downloadlinux-fefa8ff810c5ab4c4206aed9d159c4d6fe8d4f1c.tar.xz
linux-fefa8ff810c5ab4c4206aed9d159c4d6fe8d4f1c.zip
cpufreq: unlock when failing cpufreq_update_policy()
Commit bd0fa9bb455d introduced a failure path to cpufreq_update_policy() if cpufreq_driver->get(cpu) returns NULL. However, it jumps to the 'no_policy' label, which exits without unlocking any of the locks the function acquired earlier. This causes later calls into cpufreq to hang. Fix this by creating a new 'unlock' label and jumping to that instead. Fixes: bd0fa9bb455d ("cpufreq: Return error if ->get() failed in cpufreq_update_policy()") Link: https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/751903/kernel-3-15-and-nv-drivers-337-340-failed-to-initialize-the-nvidia-kernel-module-gtx-550-ti-/ Signed-off-by: Aaron Plattner <aplattner@nvidia.com> Cc: 3.15+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.15+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c10
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index aed2b0cb83dc..62259d27f03e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -2242,10 +2242,8 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
struct cpufreq_policy new_policy;
int ret;
- if (!policy) {
- ret = -ENODEV;
- goto no_policy;
- }
+ if (!policy)
+ return -ENODEV;
down_write(&policy->rwsem);
@@ -2264,7 +2262,7 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
new_policy.cur = cpufreq_driver->get(cpu);
if (WARN_ON(!new_policy.cur)) {
ret = -EIO;
- goto no_policy;
+ goto unlock;
}
if (!policy->cur) {
@@ -2279,10 +2277,10 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
ret = cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
+unlock:
up_write(&policy->rwsem);
cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
-no_policy:
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_update_policy);