summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>2016-06-03 07:28:47 +0200
committerRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>2016-06-09 00:58:05 +0200
commitf8bfc116cacbdf7e0e655d8a798a242087ed70a5 (patch)
tree2abbe90962cff00f2dcdac17f2981573e62d105b /drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c
parentcpufreq: s3c24xx: Remove useless checks (diff)
downloadlinux-f8bfc116cacbdf7e0e655d8a798a242087ed70a5.tar.xz
linux-f8bfc116cacbdf7e0e655d8a798a242087ed70a5.zip
cpufreq: Remove cpufreq_frequency_get_table()
Most of the callers of cpufreq_frequency_get_table() already have the pointer to a valid 'policy' structure and they don't really need to go through the per-cpu variable first and then a check to validate the frequency, in order to find the freq-table for the policy. Directly use the policy->freq_table field instead for them. Only one user of that API is left after above changes, cpu_cooling.c and it accesses the freq_table in a racy way as the policy can get freed in between. Fix it by using cpufreq_cpu_get() properly. Since there are no more users of cpufreq_frequency_get_table() left, get rid of it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> (cpu_cooling.c) Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c3
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c
index 7c4cd5c634f2..dc112481a408 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static int pmi_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
unsigned long event, void *data)
{
struct cpufreq_policy *policy = data;
- struct cpufreq_frequency_table *cbe_freqs;
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *cbe_freqs = policy->freq_table;
u8 node;
/* Should this really be called for CPUFREQ_ADJUST and CPUFREQ_NOTIFY
@@ -103,7 +103,6 @@ static int pmi_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
if (event == CPUFREQ_START)
return 0;
- cbe_freqs = cpufreq_frequency_get_table(policy->cpu);
node = cbe_cpu_to_node(policy->cpu);
pr_debug("got notified, event=%lu, node=%u\n", event, node);