summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/dma-buf
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>2023-03-03 06:03:32 +0100
committerAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>2023-03-29 01:20:12 +0200
commit3ccefdea226ba3f3b69f9e868d2b1c9995b56615 (patch)
tree5ce4119681f668e88e932ea6d4515b50ebabe229 /drivers/dma-buf
parentkmsan: add memsetXX tests (diff)
downloadlinux-3ccefdea226ba3f3b69f9e868d2b1c9995b56615.tar.xz
linux-3ccefdea226ba3f3b69f9e868d2b1c9995b56615.zip
dma-buf: system_heap: avoid reclaim for order 4
Using order 4 pages would be helpful for IOMMUs mapping, but trying to get order 4 pages could spend quite much time in the page allocation. From the perspective of responsiveness, the deterministic memory allocation speed, I think, is quite important. The order 4 allocation with __GFP_RECLAIM may spend much time in reclaim and compation logic. __GFP_NORETRY also may affect. These cause unpredictable delay. To get reasonable allocation speed from dma-buf system heap, use HIGH_ORDER_GFP for order 4 to avoid reclaim. And let me remove meaningless __GFP_COMP for order 0. According to my tests, order 4 with MID_ORDER_GFP could get more number of order 4 pages but the elapsed times could be very slow. time order 8 order 4 order 0 584 usec 0 160 0 28,428 usec 0 160 0 100,701 usec 0 160 0 76,645 usec 0 160 0 25,522 usec 0 160 0 38,798 usec 0 160 0 89,012 usec 0 160 0 23,015 usec 0 160 0 73,360 usec 0 160 0 76,953 usec 0 160 0 31,492 usec 0 160 0 75,889 usec 0 160 0 84,551 usec 0 160 0 84,352 usec 0 160 0 57,103 usec 0 160 0 93,452 usec 0 160 0 If HIGH_ORDER_GFP is used for order 4, the number of order 4 could be decreased but the elapsed time results were quite stable and fast enough. time order 8 order 4 order 0 1,356 usec 0 155 80 1,901 usec 0 11 2384 1,912 usec 0 0 2560 1,911 usec 0 0 2560 1,884 usec 0 0 2560 1,577 usec 0 0 2560 1,366 usec 0 0 2560 1,711 usec 0 0 2560 1,635 usec 0 28 2112 544 usec 10 0 0 633 usec 2 128 0 848 usec 0 160 0 729 usec 0 160 0 1,000 usec 0 160 0 1,358 usec 0 160 0 2,638 usec 0 31 2064 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230303050332.10138-1-jaewon31.kim@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Cc: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/dma-buf')
-rw-r--r--drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c5
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
index e8bd10e60998..920db302a273 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
@@ -41,12 +41,11 @@ struct dma_heap_attachment {
bool mapped;
};
-#define LOW_ORDER_GFP (GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_ZERO | __GFP_COMP)
-#define MID_ORDER_GFP (LOW_ORDER_GFP | __GFP_NOWARN)
+#define LOW_ORDER_GFP (GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_ZERO)
#define HIGH_ORDER_GFP (((GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_ZERO | __GFP_NOWARN \
| __GFP_NORETRY) & ~__GFP_RECLAIM) \
| __GFP_COMP)
-static gfp_t order_flags[] = {HIGH_ORDER_GFP, MID_ORDER_GFP, LOW_ORDER_GFP};
+static gfp_t order_flags[] = {HIGH_ORDER_GFP, HIGH_ORDER_GFP, LOW_ORDER_GFP};
/*
* The selection of the orders used for allocation (1MB, 64K, 4K) is designed
* to match with the sizes often found in IOMMUs. Using order 4 pages instead