diff options
| author | Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> | 2020-04-17 11:21:57 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> | 2020-04-24 08:31:50 +0200 |
| commit | 19c26d90ff4ca08ef2a2fef23cc9c13cfbfd891e (patch) | |
| tree | 51e636a52663a21aee2e909cc6a1869b3f4b4abe /drivers/gpio | |
| parent | gpiolib: don't call sleeping functions with a spinlock taken (diff) | |
| download | linux-19c26d90ff4ca08ef2a2fef23cc9c13cfbfd891e.tar.xz linux-19c26d90ff4ca08ef2a2fef23cc9c13cfbfd891e.zip | |
gpio: mvebu: Fix probing for chips without PWM
The PWM iomem resource is optional and its presence indicates whether
the GPIO chip has a PWM or not, which is why mvebu_pwm_probe() returned
successfully when the PWM resource was not present. With f51b18d92b66
the driver switched to devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname() and
its error return is propagated to the caller, so now a missing PWM resource
leads to a probe error in the driver.
To fix this explicitly test for the presence of the PWM resource and
return successfully when it's not there. Do this check before the check
for the clock is done (which GPIO chips without a PWM do not have). Also
move the existing comment why the PWM resource is optional up to the
actual check.
Fixes: f51b18d92b66 ("gpio: mvebu: use devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname()")
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpio')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c | 15 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c index 3c9f4fb3d5a2..bd65114eb170 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c @@ -782,6 +782,15 @@ static int mvebu_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, "marvell,armada-370-gpio")) return 0; + /* + * There are only two sets of PWM configuration registers for + * all the GPIO lines on those SoCs which this driver reserves + * for the first two GPIO chips. So if the resource is missing + * we can't treat it as an error. + */ + if (!platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "pwm")) + return 0; + if (IS_ERR(mvchip->clk)) return PTR_ERR(mvchip->clk); @@ -804,12 +813,6 @@ static int mvebu_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, mvchip->mvpwm = mvpwm; mvpwm->mvchip = mvchip; - /* - * There are only two sets of PWM configuration registers for - * all the GPIO lines on those SoCs which this driver reserves - * for the first two GPIO chips. So if the resource is missing - * we can't treat it as an error. - */ mvpwm->membase = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "pwm"); if (IS_ERR(mvpwm->membase)) return PTR_ERR(mvpwm->membase); |