diff options
| author | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2009-09-02 08:17:56 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2009-09-02 08:17:56 +0200 |
| commit | 936e894a976dd3b0f07f1f6f43c17b77b7e6146d (patch) | |
| tree | 5ed5c1f6735dcd26550594df23c8f7fe2aa21a15 /drivers/lguest/x86/switcher_32.S | |
| parent | x86, intel_txt: clean up the impact on generic code, unbreak non-x86 (diff) | |
| parent | Linux 2.6.31-rc8 (diff) | |
| download | linux-936e894a976dd3b0f07f1f6f43c17b77b7e6146d.tar.xz linux-936e894a976dd3b0f07f1f6f43c17b77b7e6146d.zip | |
Merge commit 'v2.6.31-rc8' into x86/txt
Conflicts:
arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c
security/Kconfig
Merge reason: resolve the conflicts, bump up from rc3 to rc8.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/lguest/x86/switcher_32.S')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/lguest/x86/switcher_32.S | 22 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/lguest/x86/switcher_32.S b/drivers/lguest/x86/switcher_32.S index 3fc15318a80f..40634b0db9f7 100644 --- a/drivers/lguest/x86/switcher_32.S +++ b/drivers/lguest/x86/switcher_32.S @@ -1,12 +1,15 @@ -/*P:900 This is the Switcher: code which sits at 0xFFC00000 astride both the - * Host and Guest to do the low-level Guest<->Host switch. It is as simple as - * it can be made, but it's naturally very specific to x86. +/*P:900 + * This is the Switcher: code which sits at 0xFFC00000 (or 0xFFE00000) astride + * both the Host and Guest to do the low-level Guest<->Host switch. It is as + * simple as it can be made, but it's naturally very specific to x86. * * You have now completed Preparation. If this has whet your appetite; if you * are feeling invigorated and refreshed then the next, more challenging stage - * can be found in "make Guest". :*/ + * can be found in "make Guest". + :*/ -/*M:012 Lguest is meant to be simple: my rule of thumb is that 1% more LOC must +/*M:012 + * Lguest is meant to be simple: my rule of thumb is that 1% more LOC must * gain at least 1% more performance. Since neither LOC nor performance can be * measured beforehand, it generally means implementing a feature then deciding * if it's worth it. And once it's implemented, who can say no? @@ -31,11 +34,14 @@ * Host (which is actually really easy). * * Two questions remain. Would the performance gain outweigh the complexity? - * And who would write the verse documenting it? :*/ + * And who would write the verse documenting it? +:*/ -/*M:011 Lguest64 handles NMI. This gave me NMI envy (until I looked at their +/*M:011 + * Lguest64 handles NMI. This gave me NMI envy (until I looked at their * code). It's worth doing though, since it would let us use oprofile in the - * Host when a Guest is running. :*/ + * Host when a Guest is running. +:*/ /*S:100 * Welcome to the Switcher itself! |