sched: Remove proliferation of wait_on_bit() action functions

The current "wait_on_bit" interface requires an 'action'
function to be provided which does the actual waiting.
There are over 20 such functions, many of them identical.
Most cases can be satisfied by one of just two functions, one
which uses io_schedule() and one which just uses schedule().

So:
 Rename wait_on_bit and        wait_on_bit_lock to
        wait_on_bit_action and wait_on_bit_lock_action
 to make it explicit that they need an action function.

 Introduce new wait_on_bit{,_lock} and wait_on_bit{,_lock}_io
 which are *not* given an action function but implicitly use
 a standard one.
 The decision to error-out if a signal is pending is now made
 based on the 'mode' argument rather than being encoded in the action
 function.

 All instances of the old wait_on_bit and wait_on_bit_lock which
 can use the new version have been changed accordingly and their
 action functions have been discarded.
 wait_on_bit{_lock} does not return any specific error code in the
 event of a signal so the caller must check for non-zero and
 interpolate their own error code as appropriate.

The wait_on_bit() call in __fscache_wait_on_invalidate() was
ambiguous as it specified TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE but used
fscache_wait_bit_interruptible as an action function.
David Howells confirms this should be uniformly
"uninterruptible"

The main remaining user of wait_on_bit{,_lock}_action is NFS
which needs to use a freezer-aware schedule() call.

A comment in fs/gfs2/glock.c notes that having multiple 'action'
functions is useful as they display differently in the 'wchan'
field of 'ps'. (and /proc/$PID/wchan).
As the new bit_wait{,_io} functions are tagged "__sched", they
will not show up at all, but something higher in the stack.  So
the distinction will still be visible, only with different
function names (gds2_glock_wait versus gfs2_glock_dq_wait in the
gfs2/glock.c case).

Since first version of this patch (against 3.15) two new action
functions appeared, on in NFS and one in CIFS.  CIFS also now
uses an action function that makes the same freezer aware
schedule call as NFS.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> (fscache, keys)
Acked-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> (gfs2)
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140707051603.28027.72349.stgit@notabene.brown
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 14 insertions, 27 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
index 4e84095833db..96c92b75452f 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
@@ -615,16 +615,6 @@ static void write_endio(struct bio *bio, int error)
 }
 
 /*
- * This function is called when wait_on_bit is actually waiting.
- */
-static int do_io_schedule(void *word)
-{
-	io_schedule();
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-/*
  * Initiate a write on a dirty buffer, but don't wait for it.
  *
  * - If the buffer is not dirty, exit.
@@ -640,8 +630,7 @@ static void __write_dirty_buffer(struct dm_buffer *b,
 		return;
 
 	clear_bit(B_DIRTY, &b->state);
-	wait_on_bit_lock(&b->state, B_WRITING,
-			 do_io_schedule, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+	wait_on_bit_lock_io(&b->state, B_WRITING, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 
 	if (!write_list)
 		submit_io(b, WRITE, b->block, write_endio);
@@ -675,9 +664,9 @@ static void __make_buffer_clean(struct dm_buffer *b)
 	if (!b->state)	/* fast case */
 		return;
 
-	wait_on_bit(&b->state, B_READING, do_io_schedule, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+	wait_on_bit_io(&b->state, B_READING, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 	__write_dirty_buffer(b, NULL);
-	wait_on_bit(&b->state, B_WRITING, do_io_schedule, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+	wait_on_bit_io(&b->state, B_WRITING, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1030,7 +1019,7 @@ static void *new_read(struct dm_bufio_client *c, sector_t block,
 	if (need_submit)
 		submit_io(b, READ, b->block, read_endio);
 
-	wait_on_bit(&b->state, B_READING, do_io_schedule, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+	wait_on_bit_io(&b->state, B_READING, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 
 	if (b->read_error) {
 		int error = b->read_error;
@@ -1209,15 +1198,13 @@ again:
 				dropped_lock = 1;
 				b->hold_count++;
 				dm_bufio_unlock(c);
-				wait_on_bit(&b->state, B_WRITING,
-					    do_io_schedule,
-					    TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+				wait_on_bit_io(&b->state, B_WRITING,
+					       TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 				dm_bufio_lock(c);
 				b->hold_count--;
 			} else
-				wait_on_bit(&b->state, B_WRITING,
-					    do_io_schedule,
-					    TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+				wait_on_bit_io(&b->state, B_WRITING,
+					       TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 		}
 
 		if (!test_bit(B_DIRTY, &b->state) &&
@@ -1321,15 +1308,15 @@ retry:
 
 	__write_dirty_buffer(b, NULL);
 	if (b->hold_count == 1) {
-		wait_on_bit(&b->state, B_WRITING,
-			    do_io_schedule, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+		wait_on_bit_io(&b->state, B_WRITING,
+			       TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 		set_bit(B_DIRTY, &b->state);
 		__unlink_buffer(b);
 		__link_buffer(b, new_block, LIST_DIRTY);
 	} else {
 		sector_t old_block;
-		wait_on_bit_lock(&b->state, B_WRITING,
-				 do_io_schedule, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+		wait_on_bit_lock_io(&b->state, B_WRITING,
+				    TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 		/*
 		 * Relink buffer to "new_block" so that write_callback
 		 * sees "new_block" as a block number.
@@ -1341,8 +1328,8 @@ retry:
 		__unlink_buffer(b);
 		__link_buffer(b, new_block, b->list_mode);
 		submit_io(b, WRITE, new_block, write_endio);
-		wait_on_bit(&b->state, B_WRITING,
-			    do_io_schedule, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+		wait_on_bit_io(&b->state, B_WRITING,
+			       TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 		__unlink_buffer(b);
 		__link_buffer(b, old_block, b->list_mode);
 	}