diff options
| author | G, Manjunath Kondaiah <manjugk@ti.com> | 2010-10-19 11:02:48 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> | 2010-10-29 00:30:16 +0200 |
| commit | b0b4a7c28ebee0763cae90d470cfff501a83be37 (patch) | |
| tree | cff1414ea896c45036bfd12add01c4fa94a07777 /drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c | |
| parent | regulator: max8998 BUCK1/2 voltage change with use of GPIOs (diff) | |
| download | linux-b0b4a7c28ebee0763cae90d470cfff501a83be37.tar.xz linux-b0b4a7c28ebee0763cae90d470cfff501a83be37.zip | |
mfd: Fix twl-irq function declaration warnings
Fixes following sparse warnings for twl4030 and twl6030 irq files.
drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c:783:5: warning: symbol 'twl4030_init_irq' was not
declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c:863:5: warning: symbol 'twl4030_exit_irq' was not
declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c:873:5: warning: symbol 'twl4030_init_chip_irq' was
not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c:226:5: warning: symbol 'twl6030_init_irq' was not
declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c:290:5: warning: symbol 'twl6030_exit_irq' was not
declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: G, Manjunath Kondaiah <manjugk@ti.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to '')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c index 2d3bb82dbf24..aaedb11d9d2c 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ #include <linux/i2c/twl.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include "twl-core.h" + /* * TWL6030 (unlike its predecessors, which had two level interrupt handling) * three interrupt registers INT_STS_A, INT_STS_B and INT_STS_C. |