summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/mmc/host/at91_mci.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAnton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>2008-06-17 16:17:39 +0200
committerPierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>2008-07-15 14:14:41 +0200
commit08f80bb5196517a0dfe50dc7c10f234c0ff2f0e8 (patch)
treeaee5e1808521eb3c00ff37d50a2e8957bebbd34b /drivers/mmc/host/at91_mci.c
parentmmc_spi: add support for card-detection polling (diff)
downloadlinux-08f80bb5196517a0dfe50dc7c10f234c0ff2f0e8.tar.xz
linux-08f80bb5196517a0dfe50dc7c10f234c0ff2f0e8.zip
mmc: change .get_ro() callback semantics
Now get_ro() callback must return 0/1 values for its logical states, and negative errno values in case of error. If particular host instance doesn't support RO/WP switch, it should return -ENOSYS. This patch changes some hosts in two ways: 1. Now functions should be smart to not return negative values in "RO asserted" case (particularly gpio_ calls could return negative values for the outermost GPIOs). Also, board code usually passes get_ro() callbacks that directly return gpioreg & bit result, so at91_mci, imxmmc, pxamci and mmc_spi's get_ro() handlers need take special care when returning platform's values to the mmc core. 2. In case of host instance didn't implement get_ro() callback, it should really return -ENOSYS and let the mmc core decide what to do about it (mmc core thinks the same way as the hosts, so it isn't functional change). Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/mmc/host/at91_mci.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/mmc/host/at91_mci.c18
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/at91_mci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/at91_mci.c
index 8979ad330a4d..b9d4ed6b29b1 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/at91_mci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/at91_mci.c
@@ -793,19 +793,15 @@ static irqreturn_t at91_mmc_det_irq(int irq, void *_host)
static int at91_mci_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
{
- int read_only = 0;
struct at91mci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
- if (host->board->wp_pin) {
- read_only = gpio_get_value(host->board->wp_pin);
- printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: card is %s\n", mmc_hostname(mmc),
- (read_only ? "read-only" : "read-write") );
- }
- else {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: host does not support reading read-only "
- "switch. Assuming write-enable.\n", mmc_hostname(mmc));
- }
- return read_only;
+ if (host->board->wp_pin)
+ return !!gpio_get_value(host->board->wp_pin);
+ /*
+ * Board doesn't support read only detection; let the mmc core
+ * decide what to do.
+ */
+ return -ENOSYS;
}
static const struct mmc_host_ops at91_mci_ops = {