netpoll: Remove gfp parameter from __netpoll_setup

The gfp parameter was added in:
commit 47be03a28cc6c80e3aa2b3e8ed6d960ff0c5c0af
Author: Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Aug 10 01:24:37 2012 +0000

    netpoll: use GFP_ATOMIC in slave_enable_netpoll() and __netpoll_setup()

    slave_enable_netpoll() and __netpoll_setup() may be called
    with read_lock() held, so should use GFP_ATOMIC to allocate
    memory. Eric suggested to pass gfp flags to __netpoll_setup().

    Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
    Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
    Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
    Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
    Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The reason for the gfp parameter was removed in:
commit c4cdef9b7183159c23c7302aaf270d64c549f557
Author: dingtianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue Jul 23 15:25:27 2013 +0800

    bonding: don't call slave_xxx_netpoll under spinlocks

    The slave_xxx_netpoll will call synchronize_rcu_bh(),
    so the function may schedule and sleep, it should't be
    called under spinlocks.

    bond_netpoll_setup() and bond_netpoll_cleanup() are always
    protected by rtnl lock, it is no need to take the read lock,
    as the slave list couldn't be changed outside rtnl lock.

    Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
    Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
    Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Nothing else that calls __netpoll_setup or ndo_netpoll_setup
requires a gfp paramter, so remove the gfp parameter from both
of these functions making the code clearer.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/net/team/team.c b/drivers/net/team/team.c
index 2b1a1d61072c..33008c1d1d67 100644
--- a/drivers/net/team/team.c
+++ b/drivers/net/team/team.c
@@ -1031,8 +1031,7 @@ static void team_port_leave(struct team *team, struct team_port *port)
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
-static int team_port_enable_netpoll(struct team *team, struct team_port *port,
-				    gfp_t gfp)
+static int team_port_enable_netpoll(struct team *team, struct team_port *port)
 {
 	struct netpoll *np;
 	int err;
@@ -1040,11 +1039,11 @@ static int team_port_enable_netpoll(struct team *team, struct team_port *port,
 	if (!team->dev->npinfo)
 		return 0;
 
-	np = kzalloc(sizeof(*np), gfp);
+	np = kzalloc(sizeof(*np), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!np)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	err = __netpoll_setup(np, port->dev, gfp);
+	err = __netpoll_setup(np, port->dev);
 	if (err) {
 		kfree(np);
 		return err;
@@ -1067,8 +1066,7 @@ static void team_port_disable_netpoll(struct team_port *port)
 	kfree(np);
 }
 #else
-static int team_port_enable_netpoll(struct team *team, struct team_port *port,
-				    gfp_t gfp)
+static int team_port_enable_netpoll(struct team *team, struct team_port *port)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -1156,7 +1154,7 @@ static int team_port_add(struct team *team, struct net_device *port_dev)
 		goto err_vids_add;
 	}
 
-	err = team_port_enable_netpoll(team, port, GFP_KERNEL);
+	err = team_port_enable_netpoll(team, port);
 	if (err) {
 		netdev_err(dev, "Failed to enable netpoll on device %s\n",
 			   portname);
@@ -1850,7 +1848,7 @@ static void team_netpoll_cleanup(struct net_device *dev)
 }
 
 static int team_netpoll_setup(struct net_device *dev,
-			      struct netpoll_info *npifo, gfp_t gfp)
+			      struct netpoll_info *npifo)
 {
 	struct team *team = netdev_priv(dev);
 	struct team_port *port;
@@ -1858,7 +1856,7 @@ static int team_netpoll_setup(struct net_device *dev,
 
 	mutex_lock(&team->lock);
 	list_for_each_entry(port, &team->port_list, list) {
-		err = team_port_enable_netpoll(team, port, gfp);
+		err = team_port_enable_netpoll(team, port);
 		if (err) {
 			__team_netpoll_cleanup(team);
 			break;