summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBen Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>2017-06-16 09:37:45 +0200
committerKalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>2017-06-21 15:17:21 +0200
commitcc914a55006eb16f0d46188fd1f50d1fa014dbc8 (patch)
tree378d4cc01336f8e70719c7df51423510d73245fd /drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h
parentath10k: use complete VHT chan width for 160MHz workaround (diff)
downloadlinux-cc914a55006eb16f0d46188fd1f50d1fa014dbc8.tar.xz
linux-cc914a55006eb16f0d46188fd1f50d1fa014dbc8.zip
ath10k: configure rxnss_override for QCA9984
QCA9984 hardware can do 4x4 at 80Mhz, but only 2x2 at 160Mhz. First, report this to user-space by setting the max-tx-speed and max-rx-speed vht capabilities. Second, if the peer rx-speed is configured, and if we are in 160 or 80+80 mode, and the peer rx-speed matches the max speed for 2x2 or 1x1 at 160Mhz (long guard interval), then use that info to set the peer_bw_rxnss_override appropriately. Without this, a 9984 firmware will not use 2x2 ratesets when transmitting to peer (it will be stuck at 1x1), because the firmware would not have configured the rxnss_override. Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> [sven.eckelmann@openmesh.com: rebase, cleanup, drop 160Mhz workaround cleanup] Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann@openmesh.com> [kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com: use hw_params, rename the title] Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h')
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h6
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h
index be3eea429ec6..97dc1479f44e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h
@@ -535,6 +535,12 @@ struct ath10k_hw_params {
/* Number of bytes to be discarded for each FFT sample */
int spectral_bin_discard;
+
+ /* The board may have a restricted NSS for 160 or 80+80 vs what it
+ * can do for 80Mhz.
+ */
+ int vht160_mcs_rx_highest;
+ int vht160_mcs_tx_highest;
};
struct htt_rx_desc;