summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945-rs.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>2008-10-21 12:40:02 +0200
committerJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>2008-11-01 00:00:23 +0100
commite6a9854b05c1a6af1308fe2b8c68f35abf28a3ee (patch)
tree241f611f8194586ccabf61bacb060508773b9d05 /drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945-rs.c
parentmac80211: add might_sleep to hw_config (diff)
downloadlinux-e6a9854b05c1a6af1308fe2b8c68f35abf28a3ee.tar.xz
linux-e6a9854b05c1a6af1308fe2b8c68f35abf28a3ee.zip
mac80211/drivers: rewrite the rate control API
So after the previous changes we were still unhappy with how convoluted the API is and decided to make things simpler for everybody. This completely changes the rate control API, now taking into account 802.11n with MCS rates and more control, most drivers don't support that though. Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945-rs.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945-rs.c57
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 39 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945-rs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945-rs.c
index c25daec4f93d..f440ed0fe543 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945-rs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945-rs.c
@@ -422,34 +422,6 @@ static void rs_free_sta(void *priv, struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
}
-/*
- * get ieee prev rate from rate scale table.
- * for A and B mode we need to overright prev
- * value
- */
-static int rs_adjust_next_rate(struct iwl3945_priv *priv, int rate)
-{
- int next_rate = iwl3945_get_prev_ieee_rate(rate);
-
- switch (priv->band) {
- case IEEE80211_BAND_5GHZ:
- if (rate == IWL_RATE_12M_INDEX)
- next_rate = IWL_RATE_9M_INDEX;
- else if (rate == IWL_RATE_6M_INDEX)
- next_rate = IWL_RATE_6M_INDEX;
- break;
-/* XXX cannot be invoked in current mac80211 so not a regression
- case MODE_IEEE80211B:
- if (rate == IWL_RATE_11M_INDEX_TABLE)
- next_rate = IWL_RATE_5M_INDEX_TABLE;
- break;
- */
- default:
- break;
- }
-
- return next_rate;
-}
/**
* rs_tx_status - Update rate control values based on Tx results
*
@@ -460,17 +432,21 @@ static void rs_tx_status(void *priv_rate, struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband
struct ieee80211_sta *sta, void *priv_sta,
struct sk_buff *skb)
{
- u8 retries, current_count;
+ u8 retries = 0, current_count;
int scale_rate_index, first_index, last_index;
unsigned long flags;
struct iwl3945_priv *priv = (struct iwl3945_priv *)priv_rate;
struct iwl3945_rs_sta *rs_sta = priv_sta;
struct ieee80211_tx_info *info = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb);
+ int i;
IWL_DEBUG_RATE("enter\n");
- retries = info->status.retry_count;
- first_index = sband->bitrates[info->tx_rate_idx].hw_value;
+ for (i = 0; i < IEEE80211_TX_MAX_RATES; i++)
+ retries += info->status.rates[i].count;
+ retries--;
+
+ first_index = sband->bitrates[info->status.rates[0].idx].hw_value;
if ((first_index < 0) || (first_index >= IWL_RATE_COUNT)) {
IWL_DEBUG_RATE("leave: Rate out of bounds: %d\n", first_index);
return;
@@ -502,7 +478,7 @@ static void rs_tx_status(void *priv_rate, struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband
last_index = scale_rate_index;
} else {
current_count = priv->retry_rate;
- last_index = rs_adjust_next_rate(priv,
+ last_index = iwl3945_rs_next_rate(priv,
scale_rate_index);
}
@@ -518,7 +494,7 @@ static void rs_tx_status(void *priv_rate, struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband
if (retries)
scale_rate_index =
- rs_adjust_next_rate(priv, scale_rate_index);
+ iwl3945_rs_next_rate(priv, scale_rate_index);
}
@@ -630,10 +606,11 @@ static u16 iwl3945_get_adjacent_rate(struct iwl3945_rs_sta *rs_sta,
* rate table and must reference the driver allocated rate table
*
*/
-static void rs_get_rate(void *priv_r, struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband,
- struct ieee80211_sta *sta, void *priv_sta,
- struct sk_buff *skb, struct rate_selection *sel)
+static void rs_get_rate(void *priv_r, struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
+ void *priv_sta, struct ieee80211_tx_rate_control *txrc)
{
+ struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband = txrc->sband;
+ struct sk_buff *skb = txrc->skb;
u8 low = IWL_RATE_INVALID;
u8 high = IWL_RATE_INVALID;
u16 high_low;
@@ -649,6 +626,7 @@ static void rs_get_rate(void *priv_r, struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband,
struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *)skb->data;
u16 fc, rate_mask;
struct iwl3945_priv *priv = (struct iwl3945_priv *)priv_r;
+ struct ieee80211_tx_info *info = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb);
IWL_DEBUG_RATE("enter\n");
@@ -659,7 +637,7 @@ static void rs_get_rate(void *priv_r, struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband,
is_multicast_ether_addr(hdr->addr1) ||
!sta || !priv_sta) {
IWL_DEBUG_RATE("leave: No STA priv data to update!\n");
- sel->rate_idx = rate_lowest_index(sband, sta);
+ info->control.rates[0].idx = rate_lowest_index(sband, sta);
return;
}
@@ -792,9 +770,10 @@ static void rs_get_rate(void *priv_r, struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband,
rs_sta->last_txrate_idx = index;
if (sband->band == IEEE80211_BAND_5GHZ)
- sel->rate_idx = rs_sta->last_txrate_idx - IWL_FIRST_OFDM_RATE;
+ info->control.rates[0].idx = rs_sta->last_txrate_idx -
+ IWL_FIRST_OFDM_RATE;
else
- sel->rate_idx = rs_sta->last_txrate_idx;
+ info->control.rates[0].idx = rs_sta->last_txrate_idx;
IWL_DEBUG_RATE("leave: %d\n", index);
}