summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/net/wireless/st
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>2016-10-25 22:21:04 +0200
committerKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>2016-11-17 07:47:58 +0100
commit7fc1503c906f0fac62d3506a6e993e49fb996248 (patch)
tree918965779c54a0515082ed35a0642ec86509131c /drivers/net/wireless/st
parentwireless: fix bogus maybe-uninitialized warning (diff)
downloadlinux-7fc1503c906f0fac62d3506a6e993e49fb996248.tar.xz
linux-7fc1503c906f0fac62d3506a6e993e49fb996248.zip
cw1200: fix bogus maybe-uninitialized warning
On x86, the cw1200 driver produces a rather silly warning about the possible use of the 'ret' variable without an initialization presumably after being confused by the architecture specific definition of WARN_ON: drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c: In function ‘wsm_handle_rx’: drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c:1457:9: error: ‘ret’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] We have already checked that 'count' is larger than 0 here, so we know that 'ret' is initialized. Changing the 'for' loop into do/while also makes this clear to the compiler. Suggested-by: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/wireless/st')
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c8
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c b/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c
index ffb245e941bb..be4c22e0d902 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c
@@ -379,7 +379,6 @@ static int wsm_multi_tx_confirm(struct cw1200_common *priv,
{
int ret;
int count;
- int i;
count = WSM_GET32(buf);
if (WARN_ON(count <= 0))
@@ -395,11 +394,10 @@ static int wsm_multi_tx_confirm(struct cw1200_common *priv,
}
cw1200_debug_txed_multi(priv, count);
- for (i = 0; i < count; ++i) {
+ do {
ret = wsm_tx_confirm(priv, buf, link_id);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- }
+ } while (!ret && --count);
+
return ret;
underflow: