diff options
author | Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> | 2010-10-04 14:47:23 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> | 2010-10-14 18:46:33 +0200 |
commit | 085fbca29d7b4574c4e42189ee5789004e4beff7 (patch) | |
tree | e573c78ee748410861112635643d8a8294f89e2a /drivers/net/wireless | |
parent | iwlgn: need longer tx queue stuck timer for coex devices (diff) | |
download | linux-085fbca29d7b4574c4e42189ee5789004e4beff7.tar.xz linux-085fbca29d7b4574c4e42189ee5789004e4beff7.zip |
iwlwifi: allow probe-after-rx on 2.4 GHz
There are two passive 2.4 GHz channels: 12 and 13.
If you have a hidden SSID on those, you will not
be able to connect to it because we don't send out
probe requests there. We can allow this by using
the firmware's probe-after-rx functionality on
those channels as well.
This fixes
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16462
Reported-by: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/wireless')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c | 40 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c | 16 |
2 files changed, 28 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c index c1a389883af0..b555edd53354 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c @@ -1447,35 +1447,35 @@ int iwlagn_request_scan(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct ieee80211_vif *vif) if (priv->cfg->bt_params && priv->cfg->bt_params->advanced_bt_coexist) scan->tx_cmd.tx_flags |= TX_CMD_FLG_IGNORE_BT; - scan->good_CRC_th = IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_DISABLED; break; case IEEE80211_BAND_5GHZ: rate = IWL_RATE_6M_PLCP; - /* - * If active scanning is requested but a certain channel is - * marked passive, we can do active scanning if we detect - * transmissions. - * - * There is an issue with some firmware versions that triggers - * a sysassert on a "good CRC threshold" of zero (== disabled), - * on a radar channel even though this means that we should NOT - * send probes. - * - * The "good CRC threshold" is the number of frames that we - * need to receive during our dwell time on a channel before - * sending out probes -- setting this to a huge value will - * mean we never reach it, but at the same time work around - * the aforementioned issue. Thus use IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_NEVER - * here instead of IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_DISABLED. - */ - scan->good_CRC_th = is_active ? IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_DEFAULT : - IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_NEVER; break; default: IWL_WARN(priv, "Invalid scan band\n"); return -EIO; } + /* + * If active scanning is requested but a certain channel is + * marked passive, we can do active scanning if we detect + * transmissions. + * + * There is an issue with some firmware versions that triggers + * a sysassert on a "good CRC threshold" of zero (== disabled), + * on a radar channel even though this means that we should NOT + * send probes. + * + * The "good CRC threshold" is the number of frames that we + * need to receive during our dwell time on a channel before + * sending out probes -- setting this to a huge value will + * mean we never reach it, but at the same time work around + * the aforementioned issue. Thus use IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_NEVER + * here instead of IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_DISABLED. + */ + scan->good_CRC_th = is_active ? IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_DEFAULT : + IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_NEVER; + band = priv->scan_band; if (priv->cfg->scan_rx_antennas[band]) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c index 980c6096620a..3ee3e55fa546 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c @@ -2938,18 +2938,10 @@ int iwl3945_request_scan(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct ieee80211_vif *vif) case IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ: scan->flags = RXON_FLG_BAND_24G_MSK | RXON_FLG_AUTO_DETECT_MSK; scan->tx_cmd.rate = IWL_RATE_1M_PLCP; - scan->good_CRC_th = 0; band = IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ; break; case IEEE80211_BAND_5GHZ: scan->tx_cmd.rate = IWL_RATE_6M_PLCP; - /* - * If active scaning is requested but a certain channel - * is marked passive, we can do active scanning if we - * detect transmissions. - */ - scan->good_CRC_th = is_active ? IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_DEFAULT : - IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_DISABLED; band = IEEE80211_BAND_5GHZ; break; default: @@ -2957,6 +2949,14 @@ int iwl3945_request_scan(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct ieee80211_vif *vif) return -EIO; } + /* + * If active scaning is requested but a certain channel + * is marked passive, we can do active scanning if we + * detect transmissions. + */ + scan->good_CRC_th = is_active ? IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_DEFAULT : + IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_DISABLED; + if (!priv->is_internal_short_scan) { scan->tx_cmd.len = cpu_to_le16( iwl_fill_probe_req(priv, |