summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/net/wireless
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>2010-10-04 14:47:23 +0200
committerWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>2010-10-14 18:46:33 +0200
commit085fbca29d7b4574c4e42189ee5789004e4beff7 (patch)
treee573c78ee748410861112635643d8a8294f89e2a /drivers/net/wireless
parentiwlgn: need longer tx queue stuck timer for coex devices (diff)
downloadlinux-085fbca29d7b4574c4e42189ee5789004e4beff7.tar.xz
linux-085fbca29d7b4574c4e42189ee5789004e4beff7.zip
iwlwifi: allow probe-after-rx on 2.4 GHz
There are two passive 2.4 GHz channels: 12 and 13. If you have a hidden SSID on those, you will not be able to connect to it because we don't send out probe requests there. We can allow this by using the firmware's probe-after-rx functionality on those channels as well. This fixes https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16462 Reported-by: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> Tested-by: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/wireless')
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c40
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c16
2 files changed, 28 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
index c1a389883af0..b555edd53354 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
@@ -1447,35 +1447,35 @@ int iwlagn_request_scan(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
if (priv->cfg->bt_params &&
priv->cfg->bt_params->advanced_bt_coexist)
scan->tx_cmd.tx_flags |= TX_CMD_FLG_IGNORE_BT;
- scan->good_CRC_th = IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_DISABLED;
break;
case IEEE80211_BAND_5GHZ:
rate = IWL_RATE_6M_PLCP;
- /*
- * If active scanning is requested but a certain channel is
- * marked passive, we can do active scanning if we detect
- * transmissions.
- *
- * There is an issue with some firmware versions that triggers
- * a sysassert on a "good CRC threshold" of zero (== disabled),
- * on a radar channel even though this means that we should NOT
- * send probes.
- *
- * The "good CRC threshold" is the number of frames that we
- * need to receive during our dwell time on a channel before
- * sending out probes -- setting this to a huge value will
- * mean we never reach it, but at the same time work around
- * the aforementioned issue. Thus use IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_NEVER
- * here instead of IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_DISABLED.
- */
- scan->good_CRC_th = is_active ? IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_DEFAULT :
- IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_NEVER;
break;
default:
IWL_WARN(priv, "Invalid scan band\n");
return -EIO;
}
+ /*
+ * If active scanning is requested but a certain channel is
+ * marked passive, we can do active scanning if we detect
+ * transmissions.
+ *
+ * There is an issue with some firmware versions that triggers
+ * a sysassert on a "good CRC threshold" of zero (== disabled),
+ * on a radar channel even though this means that we should NOT
+ * send probes.
+ *
+ * The "good CRC threshold" is the number of frames that we
+ * need to receive during our dwell time on a channel before
+ * sending out probes -- setting this to a huge value will
+ * mean we never reach it, but at the same time work around
+ * the aforementioned issue. Thus use IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_NEVER
+ * here instead of IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_DISABLED.
+ */
+ scan->good_CRC_th = is_active ? IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_DEFAULT :
+ IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_NEVER;
+
band = priv->scan_band;
if (priv->cfg->scan_rx_antennas[band])
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c
index 980c6096620a..3ee3e55fa546 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c
@@ -2938,18 +2938,10 @@ int iwl3945_request_scan(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
case IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ:
scan->flags = RXON_FLG_BAND_24G_MSK | RXON_FLG_AUTO_DETECT_MSK;
scan->tx_cmd.rate = IWL_RATE_1M_PLCP;
- scan->good_CRC_th = 0;
band = IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ;
break;
case IEEE80211_BAND_5GHZ:
scan->tx_cmd.rate = IWL_RATE_6M_PLCP;
- /*
- * If active scaning is requested but a certain channel
- * is marked passive, we can do active scanning if we
- * detect transmissions.
- */
- scan->good_CRC_th = is_active ? IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_DEFAULT :
- IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_DISABLED;
band = IEEE80211_BAND_5GHZ;
break;
default:
@@ -2957,6 +2949,14 @@ int iwl3945_request_scan(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
return -EIO;
}
+ /*
+ * If active scaning is requested but a certain channel
+ * is marked passive, we can do active scanning if we
+ * detect transmissions.
+ */
+ scan->good_CRC_th = is_active ? IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_DEFAULT :
+ IWL_GOOD_CRC_TH_DISABLED;
+
if (!priv->is_internal_short_scan) {
scan->tx_cmd.len = cpu_to_le16(
iwl_fill_probe_req(priv,