PCI: PM: Do not use pci_platform_pm_ops for Intel MID PM

There are only two users of struct pci_platform_pm_ops in the tree,
one of which is Intel MID PM and the other one is ACPI.  They are
mutually exclusive and the MID PM should take precedence when they
both are enabled, but whether or not this really is the case hinges
on the specific ordering of arch_initcall() calls made by them.

The struct pci_platform_pm_ops abstraction is not really necessary
for just these two users, but it adds complexity and overhead because
of retoplines involved in using all of the function pointers in there.
It also makes following the code a bit more difficult than it would
be otherwise.

Moreover, Intel MID PCI PM doesn't even implement the majority of the
function pointers in struct pci_platform_pm_ops in a meaningful way,
so switch over the PCI core to calling the relevant MID PM routines,
mid_pci_set_power_state() and mid_pci_set_power_state(), directly as
needed and drop mid_pci_platform_pm.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ferry Toth <fntoth@gmail.com>

1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
index 1cce56c2aea0..0cbade42ea48 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
@@ -744,4 +744,23 @@ extern const struct attribute_group aspm_ctrl_attr_group;
 
 extern const struct attribute_group pci_dev_reset_method_attr_group;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MID
+bool pci_use_mid_pm(void);
+int mid_pci_set_power_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, pci_power_t state);
+pci_power_t mid_pci_get_power_state(struct pci_dev *pdev);
+#else
+static inline bool pci_use_mid_pm(void)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+static inline int mid_pci_set_power_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, pci_power_t state)
+{
+	return -ENODEV;
+}
+static inline pci_power_t mid_pci_get_power_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+{
+	return PCI_UNKNOWN;
+}
+#endif
+
 #endif /* DRIVERS_PCI_H */