summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>2017-10-09 18:09:05 +0200
committerWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>2018-02-20 12:34:54 +0100
commit167e61438da0664cab87c825a6c0cb83510d578e (patch)
tree3b05ff3a90e1c171d6aaa98d9bfa3ef33168c8a2 /drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
parentarm_pmu: note IRQs and PMUs per-cpu (diff)
downloadlinux-167e61438da0664cab87c825a6c0cb83510d578e.tar.xz
linux-167e61438da0664cab87c825a6c0cb83510d578e.zip
arm_pmu: acpi: request IRQs up-front
We can't request IRQs in atomic context, so for ACPI systems we'll have to request them up-front, and later associate them with CPUs. This patch reorganises the arm_pmu code to do so. As we no longer have the arm_pmu structure at probe time, a number of prototypes need to be adjusted, requiring changes to the common arm_pmu code and arm_pmu platform code. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c19
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
index 09a1a36cff57..0f197516d708 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
@@ -89,7 +89,13 @@ static int arm_pmu_acpi_parse_irqs(void)
pr_warn("No ACPI PMU IRQ for CPU%d\n", cpu);
}
+ /*
+ * Log and request the IRQ so the core arm_pmu code can manage
+ * it. We'll have to sanity-check IRQs later when we associate
+ * them with their PMUs.
+ */
per_cpu(pmu_irqs, cpu) = irq;
+ armpmu_request_irq(irq, cpu);
}
return 0;
@@ -205,14 +211,6 @@ static int arm_pmu_acpi_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu)
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &pmu->supported_cpus);
/*
- * Log and request the IRQ so the core arm_pmu code can manage it. In
- * some situations (e.g. mismatched PPIs), we may fail to request the
- * IRQ. However, it may be too late for us to do anything about it.
- * The common ARM PMU code will log a warning in this case.
- */
- armpmu_request_irq(pmu, cpu);
-
- /*
* Ideally, we'd probe the PMU here when we find the first matching
* CPU. We can't do that for several reasons; see the comment in
* arm_pmu_acpi_init().
@@ -281,11 +279,6 @@ static int arm_pmu_acpi_init(void)
if (acpi_disabled)
return 0;
- /*
- * We can't request IRQs yet, since we don't know the cookie value
- * until we know which CPUs share the same logical PMU. We'll handle
- * that in arm_pmu_acpi_cpu_starting().
- */
ret = arm_pmu_acpi_parse_irqs();
if (ret)
return ret;