diff options
author | Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> | 2022-06-21 11:04:10 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2022-06-28 09:17:46 +0200 |
commit | bb4479994945e9170534389a7762eb56149320ac (patch) | |
tree | 949e049d67ea05825d5893bda35ddf8e4bd94040 /drivers/powercap | |
parent | sched/fair: Decay task PELT values during wakeup migration (diff) | |
download | linux-bb4479994945e9170534389a7762eb56149320ac.tar.xz linux-bb4479994945e9170534389a7762eb56149320ac.zip |
sched, drivers: Remove max param from effective_cpu_util()/sched_cpu_util()
effective_cpu_util() already has a `int cpu' parameter which allows to
retrieve the CPU capacity scale factor (or maximum CPU capacity) inside
this function via an arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu).
A lot of code calling effective_cpu_util() (or the shim
sched_cpu_util()) needs the maximum CPU capacity, i.e. it will call
arch_scale_cpu_capacity() already.
But not having to pass it into effective_cpu_util() will make the EAS
wake-up code easier, especially when the maximum CPU capacity reduced
by the thermal pressure is passed through the EAS wake-up functions.
Due to the asymmetric CPU capacity support of arm/arm64 architectures,
arch_scale_cpu_capacity(int cpu) is a per-CPU variable read access via
per_cpu(cpu_scale, cpu) on such a system.
On all other architectures it is a a compile-time constant
(SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE).
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220621090414.433602-4-vdonnefort@google.com
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/powercap')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c | 33 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c b/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c index f5eced0842b3..6a88eb7e9f75 100644 --- a/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c +++ b/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c @@ -71,34 +71,19 @@ static u64 set_pd_power_limit(struct dtpm *dtpm, u64 power_limit) static u64 scale_pd_power_uw(struct cpumask *pd_mask, u64 power) { - unsigned long max = 0, sum_util = 0; + unsigned long max, sum_util = 0; int cpu; - for_each_cpu_and(cpu, pd_mask, cpu_online_mask) { - - /* - * The capacity is the same for all CPUs belonging to - * the same perf domain, so a single call to - * arch_scale_cpu_capacity() is enough. However, we - * need the CPU parameter to be initialized by the - * loop, so the call ends up in this block. - * - * We can initialize 'max' with a cpumask_first() call - * before the loop but the bits computation is not - * worth given the arch_scale_cpu_capacity() just - * returns a value where the resulting assembly code - * will be optimized by the compiler. - */ - max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu); - sum_util += sched_cpu_util(cpu, max); - } - /* - * In the improbable case where all the CPUs of the perf - * domain are offline, 'max' will be zero and will lead to an - * illegal operation with a zero division. + * The capacity is the same for all CPUs belonging to + * the same perf domain. */ - return max ? (power * ((sum_util << 10) / max)) >> 10 : 0; + max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpumask_first(pd_mask)); + + for_each_cpu_and(cpu, pd_mask, cpu_online_mask) + sum_util += sched_cpu_util(cpu); + + return (power * ((sum_util << 10) / max)) >> 10; } static u64 get_pd_power_uw(struct dtpm *dtpm) |