diff options
author | Balaji T K <balajitk@ti.com> | 2009-12-13 22:16:31 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> | 2009-12-14 00:26:08 +0100 |
commit | a6b49ffd2d4bba53ad172b1e78ee51fe15ab195e (patch) | |
tree | 1fc03d75e700644c3846c0eaa8b560cd5993d4ec /drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c | |
parent | mfd: Add support for twl6030 irq framework (diff) | |
download | linux-a6b49ffd2d4bba53ad172b1e78ee51fe15ab195e.tar.xz linux-a6b49ffd2d4bba53ad172b1e78ee51fe15ab195e.zip |
rtc: Add twl6030 RTC support
This patch adds support for RTC in phoenix TWL6030.
Register offset addresses have changed in TWL6030
rtc-twl.c will hence forth support all twl RTC (4030, 5030, 6030 ..)
Signed-off-by: Balaji T K <balajitk@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c | 152 |
1 files changed, 111 insertions, 41 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c index 7cea920ff6ac..c6a83a2a722c 100644 --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c @@ -34,27 +34,75 @@ /* * RTC block register offsets (use TWL_MODULE_RTC) */ -#define REG_SECONDS_REG 0x00 -#define REG_MINUTES_REG 0x01 -#define REG_HOURS_REG 0x02 -#define REG_DAYS_REG 0x03 -#define REG_MONTHS_REG 0x04 -#define REG_YEARS_REG 0x05 -#define REG_WEEKS_REG 0x06 - -#define REG_ALARM_SECONDS_REG 0x07 -#define REG_ALARM_MINUTES_REG 0x08 -#define REG_ALARM_HOURS_REG 0x09 -#define REG_ALARM_DAYS_REG 0x0A -#define REG_ALARM_MONTHS_REG 0x0B -#define REG_ALARM_YEARS_REG 0x0C - -#define REG_RTC_CTRL_REG 0x0D -#define REG_RTC_STATUS_REG 0x0E -#define REG_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG 0x0F - -#define REG_RTC_COMP_LSB_REG 0x10 -#define REG_RTC_COMP_MSB_REG 0x11 +enum { + REG_SECONDS_REG = 0, + REG_MINUTES_REG, + REG_HOURS_REG, + REG_DAYS_REG, + REG_MONTHS_REG, + REG_YEARS_REG, + REG_WEEKS_REG, + + REG_ALARM_SECONDS_REG, + REG_ALARM_MINUTES_REG, + REG_ALARM_HOURS_REG, + REG_ALARM_DAYS_REG, + REG_ALARM_MONTHS_REG, + REG_ALARM_YEARS_REG, + + REG_RTC_CTRL_REG, + REG_RTC_STATUS_REG, + REG_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG, + + REG_RTC_COMP_LSB_REG, + REG_RTC_COMP_MSB_REG, +}; +const static u8 twl4030_rtc_reg_map[] = { + [REG_SECONDS_REG] = 0x00, + [REG_MINUTES_REG] = 0x01, + [REG_HOURS_REG] = 0x02, + [REG_DAYS_REG] = 0x03, + [REG_MONTHS_REG] = 0x04, + [REG_YEARS_REG] = 0x05, + [REG_WEEKS_REG] = 0x06, + + [REG_ALARM_SECONDS_REG] = 0x07, + [REG_ALARM_MINUTES_REG] = 0x08, + [REG_ALARM_HOURS_REG] = 0x09, + [REG_ALARM_DAYS_REG] = 0x0A, + [REG_ALARM_MONTHS_REG] = 0x0B, + [REG_ALARM_YEARS_REG] = 0x0C, + + [REG_RTC_CTRL_REG] = 0x0D, + [REG_RTC_STATUS_REG] = 0x0E, + [REG_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG] = 0x0F, + + [REG_RTC_COMP_LSB_REG] = 0x10, + [REG_RTC_COMP_MSB_REG] = 0x11, +}; +const static u8 twl6030_rtc_reg_map[] = { + [REG_SECONDS_REG] = 0x00, + [REG_MINUTES_REG] = 0x01, + [REG_HOURS_REG] = 0x02, + [REG_DAYS_REG] = 0x03, + [REG_MONTHS_REG] = 0x04, + [REG_YEARS_REG] = 0x05, + [REG_WEEKS_REG] = 0x06, + + [REG_ALARM_SECONDS_REG] = 0x08, + [REG_ALARM_MINUTES_REG] = 0x09, + [REG_ALARM_HOURS_REG] = 0x0A, + [REG_ALARM_DAYS_REG] = 0x0B, + [REG_ALARM_MONTHS_REG] = 0x0C, + [REG_ALARM_YEARS_REG] = 0x0D, + + [REG_RTC_CTRL_REG] = 0x10, + [REG_RTC_STATUS_REG] = 0x11, + [REG_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG] = 0x12, + + [REG_RTC_COMP_LSB_REG] = 0x13, + [REG_RTC_COMP_MSB_REG] = 0x14, +}; /* RTC_CTRL_REG bitfields */ #define BIT_RTC_CTRL_REG_STOP_RTC_M 0x01 @@ -84,6 +132,7 @@ #define ALL_TIME_REGS 6 /*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/ +static u8 *rtc_reg_map; /* * Supports 1 byte read from TWL RTC register. @@ -92,7 +141,7 @@ static int twl_rtc_read_u8(u8 *data, u8 reg) { int ret; - ret = twl_i2c_read_u8(TWL_MODULE_RTC, data, reg); + ret = twl_i2c_read_u8(TWL_MODULE_RTC, data, (rtc_reg_map[reg])); if (ret < 0) pr_err("twl_rtc: Could not read TWL" "register %X - error %d\n", reg, ret); @@ -106,7 +155,7 @@ static int twl_rtc_write_u8(u8 data, u8 reg) { int ret; - ret = twl_i2c_write_u8(TWL_MODULE_RTC, data, reg); + ret = twl_i2c_write_u8(TWL_MODULE_RTC, data, (rtc_reg_map[reg])); if (ret < 0) pr_err("twl_rtc: Could not write TWL" "register %X - error %d\n", reg, ret); @@ -202,7 +251,7 @@ static int twl_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm) return ret; ret = twl_i2c_read(TWL_MODULE_RTC, rtc_data, - REG_SECONDS_REG, ALL_TIME_REGS); + (rtc_reg_map[REG_SECONDS_REG]), ALL_TIME_REGS); if (ret < 0) { dev_err(dev, "rtc_read_time error %d\n", ret); @@ -244,7 +293,7 @@ static int twl_rtc_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm) /* update all the time registers in one shot */ ret = twl_i2c_write(TWL_MODULE_RTC, rtc_data, - REG_SECONDS_REG, ALL_TIME_REGS); + (rtc_reg_map[REG_SECONDS_REG]), ALL_TIME_REGS); if (ret < 0) { dev_err(dev, "rtc_set_time error %d\n", ret); goto out; @@ -267,7 +316,7 @@ static int twl_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alm) int ret; ret = twl_i2c_read(TWL_MODULE_RTC, rtc_data, - REG_ALARM_SECONDS_REG, ALL_TIME_REGS); + (rtc_reg_map[REG_ALARM_SECONDS_REG]), ALL_TIME_REGS); if (ret < 0) { dev_err(dev, "rtc_read_alarm error %d\n", ret); return ret; @@ -306,7 +355,7 @@ static int twl_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alm) /* update all the alarm registers in one shot */ ret = twl_i2c_write(TWL_MODULE_RTC, alarm_data, - REG_ALARM_SECONDS_REG, ALL_TIME_REGS); + (rtc_reg_map[REG_ALARM_SECONDS_REG]), ALL_TIME_REGS); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "rtc_set_alarm error %d\n", ret); goto out; @@ -352,21 +401,23 @@ static irqreturn_t twl_rtc_interrupt(int irq, void *rtc) if (res) goto out; - /* Clear on Read enabled. RTC_IT bit of TWL4030_INT_PWR_ISR1 - * needs 2 reads to clear the interrupt. One read is done in - * do_twl_pwrirq(). Doing the second read, to clear - * the bit. - * - * FIXME the reason PWR_ISR1 needs an extra read is that - * RTC_IF retriggered until we cleared REG_ALARM_M above. - * But re-reading like this is a bad hack; by doing so we - * risk wrongly clearing status for some other IRQ (losing - * the interrupt). Be smarter about handling RTC_UF ... - */ - res = twl_i2c_read_u8(TWL4030_MODULE_INT, + if (twl_class_is_4030()) { + /* Clear on Read enabled. RTC_IT bit of TWL4030_INT_PWR_ISR1 + * needs 2 reads to clear the interrupt. One read is done in + * do_twl_pwrirq(). Doing the second read, to clear + * the bit. + * + * FIXME the reason PWR_ISR1 needs an extra read is that + * RTC_IF retriggered until we cleared REG_ALARM_M above. + * But re-reading like this is a bad hack; by doing so we + * risk wrongly clearing status for some other IRQ (losing + * the interrupt). Be smarter about handling RTC_UF ... + */ + res = twl_i2c_read_u8(TWL4030_MODULE_INT, &rd_reg, TWL4030_INT_PWR_ISR1); - if (res) - goto out; + if (res) + goto out; + } /* Notify RTC core on event */ rtc_update_irq(rtc, 1, events); @@ -432,6 +483,13 @@ static int __devinit twl_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) goto out1; } + if (twl_class_is_6030()) { + twl6030_interrupt_unmask(TWL6030_RTC_INT_MASK, + REG_INT_MSK_LINE_A); + twl6030_interrupt_unmask(TWL6030_RTC_INT_MASK, + REG_INT_MSK_STS_A); + } + /* Check RTC module status, Enable if it is off */ ret = twl_rtc_read_u8(&rd_reg, REG_RTC_CTRL_REG); if (ret < 0) @@ -472,6 +530,13 @@ static int __devexit twl_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) mask_rtc_irq_bit(BIT_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG_IT_ALARM_M); mask_rtc_irq_bit(BIT_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG_IT_TIMER_M); + if (twl_class_is_6030()) { + twl6030_interrupt_mask(TWL6030_RTC_INT_MASK, + REG_INT_MSK_LINE_A); + twl6030_interrupt_mask(TWL6030_RTC_INT_MASK, + REG_INT_MSK_STS_A); + } + free_irq(irq, rtc); @@ -526,6 +591,11 @@ static struct platform_driver twl4030rtc_driver = { static int __init twl_rtc_init(void) { + if (twl_class_is_4030()) + rtc_reg_map = (u8 *) twl4030_rtc_reg_map; + else + rtc_reg_map = (u8 *) twl6030_rtc_reg_map; + return platform_driver_register(&twl4030rtc_driver); } module_init(twl_rtc_init); |