diff options
author | Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com> | 2014-11-07 14:42:29 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> | 2014-11-20 23:17:11 +0100 |
commit | 2dcd851fe4b4fe60c2f8520bf7668d7e9b2dd76b (patch) | |
tree | e420c0d47716705eb3c76663f524938918fbb2d3 /drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | |
parent | Linux 3.18-rc5 (diff) | |
download | linux-2dcd851fe4b4fe60c2f8520bf7668d7e9b2dd76b.tar.xz linux-2dcd851fe4b4fe60c2f8520bf7668d7e9b2dd76b.zip |
thermal: cpu_cooling: Update always cpufreq policy with thermal constraints
Existing code updates cupfreq policy only while executing
cpufreq_apply_cooling() function (i.e. when notify_device != NOTIFY_INVALID).
It doesn't apply constraints when cpufreq policy update happens from any other
place but it should update the cpufreq policy with thermal constraints every
time when there is a cpufreq policy update, to keep state of
cpufreq_cooling_device and max_feq of cpufreq policy in sync. For instance
while resuming cpufreq updates cpufreq_policy and it restores default
policy->usr_policy values irrespective of cooling device's cpufreq_state since
notification gets missed because (notify_device == NOTIFY_INVALID).
Another problem, is that userspace is able to change max_freq irrespective of
cooling device's state, as notification gets missed.
This patch modifies code to maintain a global cpufreq_dev_list and applies
constraints of all matching cooling devices for policy's cpu when there is any
policy update(ends up applying the lowest max_freq among the matching cpu
cooling devices).
This patch also removes redundant check (max_freq > policy->user_policy.max),
as cpufreq framework takes care of user_policy constraints already where ever
required, otherwise its causing an issue while increasing max_freq in normal
scenerio as it restores max_freq with policy->user_policy.max which is old
(smaller) value.
Signed-off-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 37 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c index 1ab0018271c5..ad09e51ffae4 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c @@ -50,15 +50,14 @@ struct cpufreq_cooling_device { unsigned int cpufreq_state; unsigned int cpufreq_val; struct cpumask allowed_cpus; + struct list_head node; }; static DEFINE_IDR(cpufreq_idr); static DEFINE_MUTEX(cooling_cpufreq_lock); static unsigned int cpufreq_dev_count; -/* notify_table passes value to the CPUFREQ_ADJUST callback function. */ -#define NOTIFY_INVALID NULL -static struct cpufreq_cooling_device *notify_device; +static LIST_HEAD(cpufreq_dev_list); /** * get_idr - function to get a unique id. @@ -287,15 +286,12 @@ static int cpufreq_apply_cooling(struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_device, cpufreq_device->cpufreq_state = cooling_state; cpufreq_device->cpufreq_val = clip_freq; - notify_device = cpufreq_device; for_each_cpu(cpuid, mask) { if (is_cpufreq_valid(cpuid)) cpufreq_update_policy(cpuid); } - notify_device = NOTIFY_INVALID; - return 0; } @@ -316,21 +312,28 @@ static int cpufreq_thermal_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, { struct cpufreq_policy *policy = data; unsigned long max_freq = 0; + struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_dev; - if (event != CPUFREQ_ADJUST || notify_device == NOTIFY_INVALID) + if (event != CPUFREQ_ADJUST) return 0; - if (cpumask_test_cpu(policy->cpu, ¬ify_device->allowed_cpus)) - max_freq = notify_device->cpufreq_val; - else - return 0; + mutex_lock(&cooling_cpufreq_lock); + list_for_each_entry(cpufreq_dev, &cpufreq_dev_list, node) { + if (!cpumask_test_cpu(policy->cpu, + &cpufreq_dev->allowed_cpus)) + continue; + + if (!cpufreq_dev->cpufreq_val) + cpufreq_dev->cpufreq_val = get_cpu_frequency( + cpumask_any(&cpufreq_dev->allowed_cpus), + cpufreq_dev->cpufreq_state); - /* Never exceed user_policy.max */ - if (max_freq > policy->user_policy.max) - max_freq = policy->user_policy.max; + max_freq = cpufreq_dev->cpufreq_val; - if (policy->max != max_freq) - cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, 0, max_freq); + if (policy->max != max_freq) + cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, 0, max_freq); + } + mutex_unlock(&cooling_cpufreq_lock); return 0; } @@ -486,6 +489,7 @@ __cpufreq_cooling_register(struct device_node *np, cpufreq_register_notifier(&thermal_cpufreq_notifier_block, CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER); cpufreq_dev_count++; + list_add(&cpufreq_dev->node, &cpufreq_dev_list); mutex_unlock(&cooling_cpufreq_lock); @@ -549,6 +553,7 @@ void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev) cpufreq_dev = cdev->devdata; mutex_lock(&cooling_cpufreq_lock); + list_del(&cpufreq_dev->node); cpufreq_dev_count--; /* Unregister the notifier for the last cpufreq cooling device */ |