summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>2014-12-04 05:11:55 +0100
committerEduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>2014-12-08 17:08:56 +0100
commit405fb8256226ad68cf6ba5172d289a70cb447c81 (patch)
treeadcaf187ecf0ba4ae9395b5a3faf99594bafc56c /drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
parentthermal: cpu_cooling: propagate error returned by idr_alloc() (diff)
downloadlinux-405fb8256226ad68cf6ba5172d289a70cb447c81.tar.xz
linux-405fb8256226ad68cf6ba5172d289a70cb447c81.zip
thermal: cpu_cooling: Don't match min/max frequencies for all CPUs on cooling register
In __cpufreq_cooling_register() we try to match min/max frequencies for all CPUs passed in 'clip_cpus' mask. This mask is the cpumask of cpus where the frequency constraints will be applied. Same frequency constraint can be applied only to the CPUs belonging to the same cluster (i.e. CPUs sharing clock line). For all such CPUs we have a single 'struct cpufreq_policy' structure managing them and so getting policies for all CPUs wouldn't make any sense as they will all return the same pointer. So, remove this useless check of checking min/max for all CPUs. Also update doc comment to make this more obvious that clip_cpus should be same as policy->related_cpus. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c19
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
index 5c9a2efeec22..f32573818db9 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
@@ -437,6 +437,7 @@ static struct notifier_block thermal_cpufreq_notifier_block = {
* __cpufreq_cooling_register - helper function to create cpufreq cooling device
* @np: a valid struct device_node to the cooling device device tree node
* @clip_cpus: cpumask of cpus where the frequency constraints will happen.
+ * Normally this should be same as cpufreq policy->related_cpus.
*
* This interface function registers the cpufreq cooling device with the name
* "thermal-cpufreq-%x". This api can support multiple instances of cpufreq
@@ -452,30 +453,14 @@ __cpufreq_cooling_register(struct device_node *np,
{
struct thermal_cooling_device *cool_dev;
struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_dev;
- unsigned int min = 0, max = 0;
char dev_name[THERMAL_NAME_LENGTH];
- int ret, i;
- struct cpufreq_policy policy;
+ int ret;
if (!cpufreq_frequency_get_table(cpumask_first(clip_cpus))) {
pr_debug("%s: CPUFreq table not found\n", __func__);
return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
}
- /* Verify that all the clip cpus have same freq_min, freq_max limit */
- for_each_cpu(i, clip_cpus) {
- /* continue if cpufreq policy not found and not return error */
- if (!cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, i))
- continue;
- if (min == 0 && max == 0) {
- min = policy.cpuinfo.min_freq;
- max = policy.cpuinfo.max_freq;
- } else {
- if (min != policy.cpuinfo.min_freq ||
- max != policy.cpuinfo.max_freq)
- return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
- }
- }
cpufreq_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*cpufreq_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!cpufreq_dev)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);