diff options
author | Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> | 2012-09-21 18:48:28 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> | 2012-09-21 18:48:28 +0200 |
commit | b68e7fa879cd3b1126a7c455d9da1b70299efc0d (patch) | |
tree | 96126d0337b76ab5148fcd844e971e4afe9a02b1 /drivers/vfio/pci | |
parent | vfio: Trivial Documentation correction (diff) | |
download | linux-b68e7fa879cd3b1126a7c455d9da1b70299efc0d.tar.xz linux-b68e7fa879cd3b1126a7c455d9da1b70299efc0d.zip |
vfio: Fix virqfd release race
vfoi-pci supports a mechanism like KVM's irqfd for unmasking an
interrupt through an eventfd. There are two ways to shutdown this
interface: 1) close the eventfd, 2) ioctl (such as disabling the
interrupt). Both of these do the release through a workqueue,
which can result in a segfault if two jobs get queued for the same
virqfd.
Fix this by protecting the pointer to these virqfds by a spinlock.
The vfio pci device will therefore no longer have a reference to it
once the release job is queued under lock. On the ioctl side, we
still flush the workqueue to ensure that any outstanding releases
are completed.
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/vfio/pci')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c | 76 |
1 files changed, 56 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c index 211a4920b88a..d8dedc7d3910 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c @@ -76,9 +76,24 @@ static int virqfd_wakeup(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *key) schedule_work(&virqfd->inject); } - if (flags & POLLHUP) - /* The eventfd is closing, detach from VFIO */ - virqfd_deactivate(virqfd); + if (flags & POLLHUP) { + unsigned long flags; + spin_lock_irqsave(&virqfd->vdev->irqlock, flags); + + /* + * The eventfd is closing, if the virqfd has not yet been + * queued for release, as determined by testing whether the + * vdev pointer to it is still valid, queue it now. As + * with kvm irqfds, we know we won't race against the virqfd + * going away because we hold wqh->lock to get here. + */ + if (*(virqfd->pvirqfd) == virqfd) { + *(virqfd->pvirqfd) = NULL; + virqfd_deactivate(virqfd); + } + + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&virqfd->vdev->irqlock, flags); + } return 0; } @@ -93,7 +108,6 @@ static void virqfd_ptable_queue_proc(struct file *file, static void virqfd_shutdown(struct work_struct *work) { struct virqfd *virqfd = container_of(work, struct virqfd, shutdown); - struct virqfd **pvirqfd = virqfd->pvirqfd; u64 cnt; eventfd_ctx_remove_wait_queue(virqfd->eventfd, &virqfd->wait, &cnt); @@ -101,7 +115,6 @@ static void virqfd_shutdown(struct work_struct *work) eventfd_ctx_put(virqfd->eventfd); kfree(virqfd); - *pvirqfd = NULL; } static void virqfd_inject(struct work_struct *work) @@ -122,15 +135,11 @@ static int virqfd_enable(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev, int ret = 0; unsigned int events; - if (*pvirqfd) - return -EBUSY; - virqfd = kzalloc(sizeof(*virqfd), GFP_KERNEL); if (!virqfd) return -ENOMEM; virqfd->pvirqfd = pvirqfd; - *pvirqfd = virqfd; virqfd->vdev = vdev; virqfd->handler = handler; virqfd->thread = thread; @@ -154,6 +163,23 @@ static int virqfd_enable(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev, virqfd->eventfd = ctx; /* + * virqfds can be released by closing the eventfd or directly + * through ioctl. These are both done through a workqueue, so + * we update the pointer to the virqfd under lock to avoid + * pushing multiple jobs to release the same virqfd. + */ + spin_lock_irq(&vdev->irqlock); + + if (*pvirqfd) { + spin_unlock_irq(&vdev->irqlock); + ret = -EBUSY; + goto fail; + } + *pvirqfd = virqfd; + + spin_unlock_irq(&vdev->irqlock); + + /* * Install our own custom wake-up handling so we are notified via * a callback whenever someone signals the underlying eventfd. */ @@ -187,19 +213,29 @@ fail: fput(file); kfree(virqfd); - *pvirqfd = NULL; return ret; } -static void virqfd_disable(struct virqfd *virqfd) +static void virqfd_disable(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev, + struct virqfd **pvirqfd) { - if (!virqfd) - return; + unsigned long flags; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&vdev->irqlock, flags); + + if (*pvirqfd) { + virqfd_deactivate(*pvirqfd); + *pvirqfd = NULL; + } - virqfd_deactivate(virqfd); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vdev->irqlock, flags); - /* Block until we know all outstanding shutdown jobs have completed. */ + /* + * Block until we know all outstanding shutdown jobs have completed. + * Even if we don't queue the job, flush the wq to be sure it's + * been released. + */ flush_workqueue(vfio_irqfd_cleanup_wq); } @@ -392,8 +428,8 @@ static int vfio_intx_set_signal(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev, int fd) static void vfio_intx_disable(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev) { vfio_intx_set_signal(vdev, -1); - virqfd_disable(vdev->ctx[0].unmask); - virqfd_disable(vdev->ctx[0].mask); + virqfd_disable(vdev, &vdev->ctx[0].unmask); + virqfd_disable(vdev, &vdev->ctx[0].mask); vdev->irq_type = VFIO_PCI_NUM_IRQS; vdev->num_ctx = 0; kfree(vdev->ctx); @@ -539,8 +575,8 @@ static void vfio_msi_disable(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev, bool msix) vfio_msi_set_block(vdev, 0, vdev->num_ctx, NULL, msix); for (i = 0; i < vdev->num_ctx; i++) { - virqfd_disable(vdev->ctx[i].unmask); - virqfd_disable(vdev->ctx[i].mask); + virqfd_disable(vdev, &vdev->ctx[i].unmask); + virqfd_disable(vdev, &vdev->ctx[i].mask); } if (msix) { @@ -577,7 +613,7 @@ static int vfio_pci_set_intx_unmask(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev, vfio_send_intx_eventfd, NULL, &vdev->ctx[0].unmask, fd); - virqfd_disable(vdev->ctx[0].unmask); + virqfd_disable(vdev, &vdev->ctx[0].unmask); } return 0; |