video: da8xx-fb: fixing timing off by one errors

The LCD controller represents some of the timing fields with a 0
in the register representing 1.  This was not taken into account
when these registers were being set.  Interestingly enough not
all of the LCDC controller timing registers implement this representation
so carefully went through the technical reference manual to only "fix"
the correct timings.

Signed-off-by: Darren Etheridge <detheridge@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/video/da8xx-fb.c b/drivers/video/da8xx-fb.c
index 0a0983f88075..7dfa7a70fcfe 100644
--- a/drivers/video/da8xx-fb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/da8xx-fb.c
@@ -407,9 +407,9 @@ static void lcd_cfg_horizontal_sync(int back_porch, int pulse_width,
 	u32 reg;
 
 	reg = lcdc_read(LCD_RASTER_TIMING_0_REG) & 0xf;
-	reg |= ((back_porch & 0xff) << 24)
-	    | ((front_porch & 0xff) << 16)
-	    | ((pulse_width & 0x3f) << 10);
+	reg |= (((back_porch-1) & 0xff) << 24)
+	    | (((front_porch-1) & 0xff) << 16)
+	    | (((pulse_width-1) & 0x3f) << 10);
 	lcdc_write(reg, LCD_RASTER_TIMING_0_REG);
 }
 
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static void lcd_cfg_vertical_sync(int back_porch, int pulse_width,
 	reg = lcdc_read(LCD_RASTER_TIMING_1_REG) & 0x3ff;
 	reg |= ((back_porch & 0xff) << 24)
 	    | ((front_porch & 0xff) << 16)
-	    | ((pulse_width & 0x3f) << 10);
+	    | (((pulse_width-1) & 0x3f) << 10);
 	lcdc_write(reg, LCD_RASTER_TIMING_1_REG);
 }