diff options
| author | Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com> | 2013-09-04 22:11:05 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> | 2013-10-02 18:53:26 +0200 |
| commit | 2b2b614dd24e4e6474fcf2dcf69c95c908838959 (patch) | |
| tree | 9874899c477d237e1ec207834fc730c1151088f5 /drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | |
| parent | xen/hvc: If we use xen_raw_printk let it also work on HVM guests. (diff) | |
| download | linux-2b2b614dd24e4e6474fcf2dcf69c95c908838959.tar.xz linux-2b2b614dd24e4e6474fcf2dcf69c95c908838959.zip | |
tracing/events: Add bounce tracing to swiotbl
Ftrace is currently not able to detect when SWIOTLB has to do double buffering.
Under Xen you can only see it indirectly in function_graph, when
xen_swiotlb_map_page() doesn't stop after range_straddles_page_boundary(), but
calls spinlock functions, memcpy() and xen_phys_to_bus() as well. This patch
introduces the swiotlb:swiotlb_bounced event, which also prints out the
following informations to help you find out why bouncing happened:
dev_name: 0000:08:00.0 dma_mask=ffffffffffffffff dev_addr=9149f000 size=32768
swiotlb_force=0
If you use Xen, and (dev_addr + size + 1) > dma_mask, the buffer is out of the
device's DMA range. If swiotlb_force == 1, you should really change the kernel
parameters. Otherwise, the buffer is not contiguous in mfn space.
Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>
[v1: Don't print 'swiotlb_force=X', just print swiotlb_force if it is enabled]
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 5 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c index 1b2277c311d2..b31081007a81 100644 --- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c +++ b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c @@ -42,6 +42,9 @@ #include <xen/page.h> #include <xen/xen-ops.h> #include <xen/hvc-console.h> + +#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS +#include <trace/events/swiotlb.h> /* * Used to do a quick range check in swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single and * swiotlb_tbl_sync_single_*, to see if the memory was in fact allocated by this @@ -358,6 +361,8 @@ dma_addr_t xen_swiotlb_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page, /* * Oh well, have to allocate and map a bounce buffer. */ + trace_swiotlb_bounced(dev, dev_addr, size, swiotlb_force); + map = swiotlb_tbl_map_single(dev, start_dma_addr, phys, size, dir); if (map == SWIOTLB_MAP_ERROR) return DMA_ERROR_CODE; |