diff options
| author | Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> | 2019-01-10 22:52:25 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> | 2019-04-09 01:35:56 +0200 |
| commit | e690c9e3f4fb2cc589414c5bf502dcfe04e685de (patch) | |
| tree | 2dfca439baaf49dd2db944d0b9edbf4197a7ffa6 /fs/afs/cmservice.c | |
| parent | fs: mark expected switch fall-throughs (diff) | |
| download | linux-e690c9e3f4fb2cc589414c5bf502dcfe04e685de.tar.xz linux-e690c9e3f4fb2cc589414c5bf502dcfe04e685de.zip | |
afs: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in many cases I placed a /* Fall through */ comment
at the bottom of the case, which what GCC is expecting to find.
In other cases I had to tweak a bit the format of the comments.
This patch suppresses ALL missing-break-in-switch false positives
in fs/afs
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115042 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115043 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115045 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1357430 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115047 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115050 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115051 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1467806 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1467807 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1467811 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115041 ("Missing break in switch")
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/afs/cmservice.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/afs/cmservice.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/fs/afs/cmservice.c b/fs/afs/cmservice.c index 8ee5972893ed..40e09bf547e3 100644 --- a/fs/afs/cmservice.c +++ b/fs/afs/cmservice.c @@ -285,6 +285,7 @@ static int afs_deliver_cb_callback(struct afs_call *call) call->unmarshall++; /* extract the FID array and its count in two steps */ + /* fall through */ case 1: _debug("extract FID count"); ret = afs_extract_data(call, true); @@ -304,6 +305,7 @@ static int afs_deliver_cb_callback(struct afs_call *call) afs_extract_to_buf(call, call->count * 3 * 4); call->unmarshall++; + /* Fall through */ case 2: _debug("extract FID array"); ret = afs_extract_data(call, true); @@ -329,6 +331,7 @@ static int afs_deliver_cb_callback(struct afs_call *call) call->unmarshall++; /* extract the callback array and its count in two steps */ + /* fall through */ case 3: _debug("extract CB count"); ret = afs_extract_data(call, true); @@ -344,6 +347,7 @@ static int afs_deliver_cb_callback(struct afs_call *call) iov_iter_discard(&call->iter, READ, call->count2 * 3 * 4); call->unmarshall++; + /* Fall through */ case 4: _debug("extract discard %zu/%u", iov_iter_count(&call->iter), call->count2 * 3 * 4); @@ -422,6 +426,7 @@ static int afs_deliver_cb_init_call_back_state3(struct afs_call *call) afs_extract_to_buf(call, 11 * sizeof(__be32)); call->unmarshall++; + /* Fall through */ case 1: _debug("extract UUID"); ret = afs_extract_data(call, false); @@ -537,6 +542,7 @@ static int afs_deliver_cb_probe_uuid(struct afs_call *call) afs_extract_to_buf(call, 11 * sizeof(__be32)); call->unmarshall++; + /* Fall through */ case 1: _debug("extract UUID"); ret = afs_extract_data(call, false); @@ -673,6 +679,7 @@ static int afs_deliver_yfs_cb_callback(struct afs_call *call) call->unmarshall++; /* extract the FID array and its count in two steps */ + /* Fall through */ case 1: _debug("extract FID count"); ret = afs_extract_data(call, true); @@ -692,6 +699,7 @@ static int afs_deliver_yfs_cb_callback(struct afs_call *call) afs_extract_to_buf(call, size); call->unmarshall++; + /* Fall through */ case 2: _debug("extract FID array"); ret = afs_extract_data(call, false); |