afs: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that in many cases I placed a /* Fall through */ comment
at the bottom of the case, which what GCC is expecting to find.

In other cases I had to tweak a bit the format of the comments.

This patch suppresses ALL missing-break-in-switch false positives
in fs/afs

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115042 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115043 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115045 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1357430 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115047 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115050 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115051 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1467806 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1467807 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1467811 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115041 ("Missing break in switch")
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/fs/afs/flock.c b/fs/afs/flock.c
index e432bd27a2e7..6a0174258382 100644
--- a/fs/afs/flock.c
+++ b/fs/afs/flock.c
@@ -303,6 +303,7 @@ again:
 			return;
 		}
 
+		/* Fall through */
 	default:
 		/* Looks like a lock request was withdrawn. */
 		spin_unlock(&vnode->lock);