summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/afs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMarc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>2024-02-19 15:39:02 +0100
committerChristian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>2024-02-20 09:51:21 +0100
commitbfacaf71a1482d936804213a3ffa6de73558280e (patch)
tree43f893e7730b451843882be512c1a7e175938ad6 /fs/afs
parentcachefiles: fix memory leak in cachefiles_add_cache() (diff)
downloadlinux-bfacaf71a1482d936804213a3ffa6de73558280e.tar.xz
linux-bfacaf71a1482d936804213a3ffa6de73558280e.zip
afs: Fix ignored callbacks over ipv4
When searching for a matching peer, all addresses need to be searched, not just the ipv6 ones in the fs_addresses6 list. Given that the lists no longer contain addresses, there is little reason to splitting things between separate lists, so unify them into a single list. When processing an incoming callback from an ipv4 address, this would lead to a failure to set call->server, resulting in the callback being ignored and the client seeing stale contents. Fixes: 72904d7b9bfb ("rxrpc, afs: Allow afs to pin rxrpc_peer objects") Reported-by: Markus Suvanto <markus.suvanto@gmail.com> Link: https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2024-February/008035.html Signed-off-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Link: https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2024-February/008037.html # v1 Link: https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2024-February/008066.html # v2 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240219143906.138346-2-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/afs')
-rw-r--r--fs/afs/internal.h6
-rw-r--r--fs/afs/main.c3
-rw-r--r--fs/afs/server.c14
3 files changed, 8 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/fs/afs/internal.h b/fs/afs/internal.h
index 9c03fcf7ffaa..6ce5a612937c 100644
--- a/fs/afs/internal.h
+++ b/fs/afs/internal.h
@@ -321,8 +321,7 @@ struct afs_net {
struct list_head fs_probe_slow; /* List of afs_server to probe at 5m intervals */
struct hlist_head fs_proc; /* procfs servers list */
- struct hlist_head fs_addresses4; /* afs_server (by lowest IPv4 addr) */
- struct hlist_head fs_addresses6; /* afs_server (by lowest IPv6 addr) */
+ struct hlist_head fs_addresses; /* afs_server (by lowest IPv6 addr) */
seqlock_t fs_addr_lock; /* For fs_addresses[46] */
struct work_struct fs_manager;
@@ -561,8 +560,7 @@ struct afs_server {
struct afs_server __rcu *uuid_next; /* Next server with same UUID */
struct afs_server *uuid_prev; /* Previous server with same UUID */
struct list_head probe_link; /* Link in net->fs_probe_list */
- struct hlist_node addr4_link; /* Link in net->fs_addresses4 */
- struct hlist_node addr6_link; /* Link in net->fs_addresses6 */
+ struct hlist_node addr_link; /* Link in net->fs_addresses6 */
struct hlist_node proc_link; /* Link in net->fs_proc */
struct list_head volumes; /* RCU list of afs_server_entry objects */
struct afs_server *gc_next; /* Next server in manager's list */
diff --git a/fs/afs/main.c b/fs/afs/main.c
index 1b3bd21c168a..a14f6013e316 100644
--- a/fs/afs/main.c
+++ b/fs/afs/main.c
@@ -90,8 +90,7 @@ static int __net_init afs_net_init(struct net *net_ns)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&net->fs_probe_slow);
INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&net->fs_proc);
- INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&net->fs_addresses4);
- INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&net->fs_addresses6);
+ INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&net->fs_addresses);
seqlock_init(&net->fs_addr_lock);
INIT_WORK(&net->fs_manager, afs_manage_servers);
diff --git a/fs/afs/server.c b/fs/afs/server.c
index e169121f603e..038f9d0ae3af 100644
--- a/fs/afs/server.c
+++ b/fs/afs/server.c
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ struct afs_server *afs_find_server(struct afs_net *net, const struct rxrpc_peer
seq++; /* 2 on the 1st/lockless path, otherwise odd */
read_seqbegin_or_lock(&net->fs_addr_lock, &seq);
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(server, &net->fs_addresses6, addr6_link) {
+ hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(server, &net->fs_addresses, addr_link) {
estate = rcu_dereference(server->endpoint_state);
alist = estate->addresses;
for (i = 0; i < alist->nr_addrs; i++)
@@ -177,10 +177,8 @@ added_dup:
* bit, but anything we might want to do gets messy and memory
* intensive.
*/
- if (alist->nr_ipv4 > 0)
- hlist_add_head_rcu(&server->addr4_link, &net->fs_addresses4);
- if (alist->nr_addrs > alist->nr_ipv4)
- hlist_add_head_rcu(&server->addr6_link, &net->fs_addresses6);
+ if (alist->nr_addrs > 0)
+ hlist_add_head_rcu(&server->addr_link, &net->fs_addresses);
write_sequnlock(&net->fs_addr_lock);
@@ -511,10 +509,8 @@ static void afs_gc_servers(struct afs_net *net, struct afs_server *gc_list)
list_del(&server->probe_link);
hlist_del_rcu(&server->proc_link);
- if (!hlist_unhashed(&server->addr4_link))
- hlist_del_rcu(&server->addr4_link);
- if (!hlist_unhashed(&server->addr6_link))
- hlist_del_rcu(&server->addr6_link);
+ if (!hlist_unhashed(&server->addr_link))
+ hlist_del_rcu(&server->addr_link);
}
write_sequnlock(&net->fs_lock);