diff options
author | Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> | 2015-01-28 01:24:09 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2015-02-04 07:52:30 +0100 |
commit | bfd9b2b5f80e7289fdd50210afe4d9ca5952a865 (patch) | |
tree | dd65ba421f2c4e7081b6797bb6c87c97ad2c6c9c /fs/autofs4/symlink.c | |
parent | sched/deadline: Remove cpu_active_mask from cpudl_find() (diff) | |
download | linux-bfd9b2b5f80e7289fdd50210afe4d9ca5952a865.tar.xz linux-bfd9b2b5f80e7289fdd50210afe4d9ca5952a865.zip |
sched: Pull resched loop to __schedule() callers
__schedule() disables preemption during its job and re-enables it
afterward without doing a preemption check to avoid recursion.
But if an event happens after the context switch which requires
rescheduling, we need to check again if a task of a higher priority
needs the CPU. A preempt irq can raise such a situation. To handle that,
__schedule() loops on need_resched().
But preempt_schedule_*() functions, which call __schedule(), also loop
on need_resched() to handle missed preempt irqs. Hence we end up with
the same loop happening twice.
Lets simplify that by attributing the need_resched() loop responsibility
to all __schedule() callers.
There is a risk that the outer loop now handles reschedules that used
to be handled by the inner loop with the added overhead of caller details
(inc/dec of PREEMPT_ACTIVE, irq save/restore) but assuming those inner
rescheduling loop weren't too frequent, this shouldn't matter. Especially
since the whole preemption path is now losing one loop in any case.
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1422404652-29067-2-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/autofs4/symlink.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions