btrfs: qgroup: Use independent and accurate per inode qgroup rsv

Unlike reservation calculation used in inode rsv for metadata, qgroup
doesn't really need to care about things like csum size or extent usage
for the whole tree COW.

Qgroups care more about net change of the extent usage.
That's to say, if we're going to insert one file extent, it will mostly
find its place in COWed tree block, leaving no change in extent usage.
Or causing a leaf split, resulting in one new net extent and increasing
qgroup number by nodesize.
Or in an even more rare case, increase the tree level, increasing qgroup
number by 2 * nodesize.

So here instead of using the complicated calculation for extent
allocator, which cares more about accuracy and no error, qgroup doesn't
need that over-estimated reservation.

This patch will maintain 2 new members in btrfs_block_rsv structure for
qgroup, using much smaller calculation for qgroup rsv, reducing false
EDQUOT.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index ec84e2dabb04..2771cc56a622 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -459,6 +459,25 @@ struct btrfs_block_rsv {
 	unsigned short full;
 	unsigned short type;
 	unsigned short failfast;
+
+	/*
+	 * Qgroup equivalent for @size @reserved
+	 *
+	 * Unlike normal @size/@reserved for inode rsv, qgroup doesn't care
+	 * about things like csum size nor how many tree blocks it will need to
+	 * reserve.
+	 *
+	 * Qgroup cares more about net change of the extent usage.
+	 *
+	 * So for one newly inserted file extent, in worst case it will cause
+	 * leaf split and level increase, nodesize for each file extent is
+	 * already too much.
+	 *
+	 * In short, qgroup_size/reserved is the upper limit of possible needed
+	 * qgroup metadata reservation.
+	 */
+	u64 qgroup_rsv_size;
+	u64 qgroup_rsv_reserved;
 };
 
 /*