diff options
author | Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> | 2016-05-20 22:50:33 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> | 2016-06-25 15:20:10 +0200 |
commit | 02dbfc99b424dde3cf0a492ed3bec4f222441754 (patch) | |
tree | d08f267bac15ea5939185424bbe73306b7f11cb6 /fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c | |
parent | Linux 4.7-rc4 (diff) | |
download | linux-02dbfc99b424dde3cf0a492ed3bec4f222441754.tar.xz linux-02dbfc99b424dde3cf0a492ed3bec4f222441754.zip |
Btrfs: fix ->iterate_shared() by upgrading i_rwsem for delayed nodes
Commit fe742fd4f90f ("Revert "btrfs: switch to ->iterate_shared()"")
backed out the conversion to ->iterate_shared() for Btrfs because the
delayed inode handling in btrfs_real_readdir() is racy. However, we can
still do readdir in parallel if there are no delayed nodes.
This is a temporary fix which upgrades the shared inode lock to an
exclusive lock only when we have delayed items until we come up with a
more complete solution. While we're here, rename the
btrfs_{get,put}_delayed_items functions to make it very clear that
they're just for readdir.
Tested with xfstests and by doing a parallel kernel build:
while make tinyconfig && make -j4 && git clean dqfx; do
:
done
along with a bunch of parallel finds in another shell:
while true; do
for ((i=0; i<4; i++)); do
find . >/dev/null &
done
wait
done
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c | 27 |
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c index 61561c2a3f96..d3aaabbfada0 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c @@ -1606,15 +1606,23 @@ int btrfs_inode_delayed_dir_index_count(struct inode *inode) return 0; } -void btrfs_get_delayed_items(struct inode *inode, struct list_head *ins_list, - struct list_head *del_list) +bool btrfs_readdir_get_delayed_items(struct inode *inode, + struct list_head *ins_list, + struct list_head *del_list) { struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node; struct btrfs_delayed_item *item; delayed_node = btrfs_get_delayed_node(inode); if (!delayed_node) - return; + return false; + + /* + * We can only do one readdir with delayed items at a time because of + * item->readdir_list. + */ + inode_unlock_shared(inode); + inode_lock(inode); mutex_lock(&delayed_node->mutex); item = __btrfs_first_delayed_insertion_item(delayed_node); @@ -1641,10 +1649,13 @@ void btrfs_get_delayed_items(struct inode *inode, struct list_head *ins_list, * requeue or dequeue this delayed node. */ atomic_dec(&delayed_node->refs); + + return true; } -void btrfs_put_delayed_items(struct list_head *ins_list, - struct list_head *del_list) +void btrfs_readdir_put_delayed_items(struct inode *inode, + struct list_head *ins_list, + struct list_head *del_list) { struct btrfs_delayed_item *curr, *next; @@ -1659,6 +1670,12 @@ void btrfs_put_delayed_items(struct list_head *ins_list, if (atomic_dec_and_test(&curr->refs)) kfree(curr); } + + /* + * The VFS is going to do up_read(), so we need to downgrade back to a + * read lock. + */ + downgrade_write(&inode->i_rwsem); } int btrfs_should_delete_dir_index(struct list_head *del_list, |