Btrfs: fix lots of orphan inodes when the space is not enough

We're running into having 50-100 orphans left over with xfstests 83
because of ENOSPC when trying to start the transaction for the inode update.
But in fact, it makes no sense in updating the inode for the new size while
we're deleting the stupid thing. This patch fixes this problem.

Reported-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

1 files changed, 77 insertions, 13 deletions

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
index 4e204bb8ba13..c7e75061b894 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
@@ -1065,32 +1065,25 @@ static void btrfs_release_delayed_inode(struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node)
 	}
 }
 
-static int btrfs_update_delayed_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
-				      struct btrfs_root *root,
-				      struct btrfs_path *path,
-				      struct btrfs_delayed_node *node)
+static int __btrfs_update_delayed_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
+					struct btrfs_root *root,
+					struct btrfs_path *path,
+					struct btrfs_delayed_node *node)
 {
 	struct btrfs_key key;
 	struct btrfs_inode_item *inode_item;
 	struct extent_buffer *leaf;
 	int ret;
 
-	mutex_lock(&node->mutex);
-	if (!node->inode_dirty) {
-		mutex_unlock(&node->mutex);
-		return 0;
-	}
-
 	key.objectid = node->inode_id;
 	btrfs_set_key_type(&key, BTRFS_INODE_ITEM_KEY);
 	key.offset = 0;
+
 	ret = btrfs_lookup_inode(trans, root, path, &key, 1);
 	if (ret > 0) {
 		btrfs_release_path(path);
-		mutex_unlock(&node->mutex);
 		return -ENOENT;
 	} else if (ret < 0) {
-		mutex_unlock(&node->mutex);
 		return ret;
 	}
 
@@ -1105,11 +1098,28 @@ static int btrfs_update_delayed_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 
 	btrfs_delayed_inode_release_metadata(root, node);
 	btrfs_release_delayed_inode(node);
-	mutex_unlock(&node->mutex);
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static inline int btrfs_update_delayed_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
+					     struct btrfs_root *root,
+					     struct btrfs_path *path,
+					     struct btrfs_delayed_node *node)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	mutex_lock(&node->mutex);
+	if (!node->inode_dirty) {
+		mutex_unlock(&node->mutex);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	ret = __btrfs_update_delayed_inode(trans, root, path, node);
+	mutex_unlock(&node->mutex);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static inline int
 __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 				   struct btrfs_path *path,
@@ -1230,6 +1240,60 @@ int btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+int btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode(struct inode *inode)
+{
+	struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
+	struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node = btrfs_get_delayed_node(inode);
+	struct btrfs_path *path;
+	struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!delayed_node)
+		return 0;
+
+	mutex_lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
+	if (!delayed_node->inode_dirty) {
+		mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex);
+		btrfs_release_delayed_node(delayed_node);
+		return 0;
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex);
+
+	trans = btrfs_join_transaction(delayed_node->root);
+	if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(trans);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	path = btrfs_alloc_path();
+	if (!path) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto trans_out;
+	}
+	path->leave_spinning = 1;
+
+	block_rsv = trans->block_rsv;
+	trans->block_rsv = &delayed_node->root->fs_info->delayed_block_rsv;
+
+	mutex_lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
+	if (delayed_node->inode_dirty)
+		ret = __btrfs_update_delayed_inode(trans, delayed_node->root,
+						   path, delayed_node);
+	else
+		ret = 0;
+	mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex);
+
+	btrfs_free_path(path);
+	trans->block_rsv = block_rsv;
+trans_out:
+	btrfs_end_transaction(trans, delayed_node->root);
+	btrfs_btree_balance_dirty(delayed_node->root);
+out:
+	btrfs_release_delayed_node(delayed_node);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 void btrfs_remove_delayed_node(struct inode *inode)
 {
 	struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node;