diff options
| author | David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> | 2020-02-25 15:05:53 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> | 2020-05-25 11:25:23 +0200 |
| commit | 7c09c03091ac562ddca2b393e5d65c1d37da79f1 (patch) | |
| tree | 66493f00f99d0a7a1e30df2d6a6203fd063325d0 /fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | |
| parent | btrfs: remove pointless assertion on reclaim_size counter (diff) | |
| download | linux-7c09c03091ac562ddca2b393e5d65c1d37da79f1.tar.xz linux-7c09c03091ac562ddca2b393e5d65c1d37da79f1.zip | |
btrfs: don't force read-only after error in drop snapshot
Deleting a subvolume on a full filesystem leads to ENOSPC followed by a
forced read-only. This is not a transaction abort and the filesystem is
otherwise ok, so the error should be just propagated to the callers.
This is caused by unnecessary call to btrfs_handle_fs_error for all
errors, except EAGAIN. This does not make sense as the standard
transaction abort mechanism is in btrfs_drop_snapshot so all relevant
failures are handled.
Originally in commit cb1b69f4508a ("Btrfs: forced readonly when
btrfs_drop_snapshot() fails") there was no return value at all, so the
btrfs_std_error made some sense but once the error handling and
propagation has been implemented we don't need it anymore.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Diffstat (limited to '')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c index 752b229cbb13..faa585d54eb7 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -5502,8 +5502,6 @@ out: */ if (!for_reloc && !root_dropped) btrfs_add_dead_root(root); - if (err && err != -EAGAIN) - btrfs_handle_fs_error(fs_info, err, NULL); return err; } |