diff options
| author | Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> | 2013-04-05 09:20:56 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> | 2013-05-06 21:54:35 +0200 |
| commit | e4100d987b2437596ebcf11809022b79507f3db1 (patch) | |
| tree | 2e1b987afa41149ef621581f1eb125c027453f74 /fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h | |
| parent | Btrfs: fix bad extent logging (diff) | |
| download | linux-e4100d987b2437596ebcf11809022b79507f3db1.tar.xz linux-e4100d987b2437596ebcf11809022b79507f3db1.zip | |
Btrfs: improve the performance of the csums lookup
It is very likely that there are several blocks in bio, it is very
inefficient if we get their csums one by one. This patch improves
this problem by getting the csums in batch.
According to the result of the following test, the execute time of
__btrfs_lookup_bio_sums() is down by ~28%(300us -> 217us).
# dd if=<mnt>/file of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1024
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h | 3 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h index 8eadfe406cdd..58b0e3b0ebad 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h @@ -196,7 +196,8 @@ struct btrfs_ordered_extent *btrfs_lookup_ordered_range(struct inode *inode, u64 len); int btrfs_ordered_update_i_size(struct inode *inode, u64 offset, struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered); -int btrfs_find_ordered_sum(struct inode *inode, u64 offset, u64 disk_bytenr, u32 *sum); +int btrfs_find_ordered_sum(struct inode *inode, u64 offset, u64 disk_bytenr, + u32 *sum, int len); int btrfs_run_ordered_operations(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *root, int wait); void btrfs_add_ordered_operation(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, |