diff options
author | Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> | 2022-08-08 07:45:43 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> | 2022-09-26 12:27:55 +0200 |
commit | 786672e9e1a39a231806313e3c445c236588ceef (patch) | |
tree | be700bf1e4840146bf2dca5b8199065086b54057 /fs/btrfs/scrub.c | |
parent | btrfs: scrub: move logical/physical/dev/mirror_num from scrub_sector to scrub... (diff) | |
download | linux-786672e9e1a39a231806313e3c445c236588ceef.tar.xz linux-786672e9e1a39a231806313e3c445c236588ceef.zip |
btrfs: scrub: use larger block size for data extent scrub
[PROBLEM]
The existing scrub code for data extents always limit the block size to
sectorsize.
This causes quite some extra scrub_block being allocated:
(there is a data extent at logical bytenr 298844160, length 64KiB)
alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298844160 physical=298844160 mirror=1
alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298848256 physical=298848256 mirror=1
alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298852352 physical=298852352 mirror=1
alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298856448 physical=298856448 mirror=1
alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298860544 physical=298860544 mirror=1
alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298864640 physical=298864640 mirror=1
alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298868736 physical=298868736 mirror=1
alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298872832 physical=298872832 mirror=1
alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298876928 physical=298876928 mirror=1
alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298881024 physical=298881024 mirror=1
alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298885120 physical=298885120 mirror=1
alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298889216 physical=298889216 mirror=1
alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298893312 physical=298893312 mirror=1
alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298897408 physical=298897408 mirror=1
alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298901504 physical=298901504 mirror=1
alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298905600 physical=298905600 mirror=1
...
scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298844160 physical=298844160 len=4096 mirror=1
scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298848256 physical=298848256 len=4096 mirror=1
scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298852352 physical=298852352 len=4096 mirror=1
scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298856448 physical=298856448 len=4096 mirror=1
scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298860544 physical=298860544 len=4096 mirror=1
scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298864640 physical=298864640 len=4096 mirror=1
scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298868736 physical=298868736 len=4096 mirror=1
scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298872832 physical=298872832 len=4096 mirror=1
scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298876928 physical=298876928 len=4096 mirror=1
scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298881024 physical=298881024 len=4096 mirror=1
scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298885120 physical=298885120 len=4096 mirror=1
scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298889216 physical=298889216 len=4096 mirror=1
scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298893312 physical=298893312 len=4096 mirror=1
scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298897408 physical=298897408 len=4096 mirror=1
scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298901504 physical=298901504 len=4096 mirror=1
scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298905600 physical=298905600 len=4096 mirror=1
This behavior will waste a lot of memory, especially after we have moved
quite some members from scrub_sector to scrub_block.
[FIX]
To reduce the allocation of scrub_block, and to reduce memory usage, use
BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN instead of sectorsize as the block size to scrub data
extents.
This results only one scrub_block to be allocated for above data extent:
alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298844160 physical=298844160 mirror=1
scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298844160 physical=298844160 len=65536 mirror=1
This would greatly reduce the memory usage (even it's just transient)
for larger data extents scrub.
For above example, the memory usage would be:
Old: num_sectors * (sizeof(scrub_block) + sizeof(scrub_sector))
16 * (408 + 96) = 8065
New: sizeof(scrub_block) + num_sectors * sizeof(scrub_sector)
408 + 16 * 96 = 1944
A good reduction of 75.9%.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/scrub.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c index 7aec821bd424..755273b77a3f 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c @@ -2671,11 +2671,17 @@ static int scrub_extent(struct scrub_ctx *sctx, struct map_lookup *map, u8 csum[BTRFS_CSUM_SIZE]; u32 blocksize; + /* + * Block size determines how many scrub_block will be allocated. Here + * we use BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN (64KiB) as default limit, so we won't + * allocate too many scrub_block, while still won't cause too large + * bios for large extents. + */ if (flags & BTRFS_EXTENT_FLAG_DATA) { if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK) blocksize = map->stripe_len; else - blocksize = sctx->fs_info->sectorsize; + blocksize = BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN; spin_lock(&sctx->stat_lock); sctx->stat.data_extents_scrubbed++; sctx->stat.data_bytes_scrubbed += len; |