Btrfs: if we've already started a trans handle, use that one

We currently track trans handles in current->journal_info, but we don't actually
use it.  This patch fixes it.  This will cover the case where we have multiple
people starting transactions down the call chain.  This keeps us from having to
allocate a new handle and all of that, we just increase the use count of the
current handle, save the old block_rsv, and return.  I tested this with xfstests
and it worked out fine.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
index 70bfb26df967..46f40564c168 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
@@ -184,6 +184,15 @@ static struct btrfs_trans_handle *start_transaction(struct btrfs_root *root,
 
 	if (root->fs_info->fs_state & BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_ERROR)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EROFS);
+
+	if (current->journal_info) {
+		WARN_ON(type != TRANS_JOIN && type != TRANS_JOIN_NOLOCK);
+		h = current->journal_info;
+		h->use_count++;
+		h->orig_rsv = h->block_rsv;
+		h->block_rsv = NULL;
+		goto got_it;
+	}
 again:
 	h = kmem_cache_alloc(btrfs_trans_handle_cachep, GFP_NOFS);
 	if (!h)
@@ -213,7 +222,9 @@ again:
 	h->block_group = 0;
 	h->bytes_reserved = 0;
 	h->delayed_ref_updates = 0;
+	h->use_count = 1;
 	h->block_rsv = NULL;
+	h->orig_rsv = NULL;
 
 	smp_mb();
 	if (cur_trans->blocked && may_wait_transaction(root, type)) {
@@ -241,6 +252,7 @@ again:
 		}
 	}
 
+got_it:
 	if (type != TRANS_JOIN_NOLOCK)
 		mutex_lock(&root->fs_info->trans_mutex);
 	record_root_in_trans(h, root);
@@ -428,6 +440,11 @@ static int __btrfs_end_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 	struct btrfs_fs_info *info = root->fs_info;
 	int count = 0;
 
+	if (--trans->use_count) {
+		trans->block_rsv = trans->orig_rsv;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	while (count < 4) {
 		unsigned long cur = trans->delayed_ref_updates;
 		trans->delayed_ref_updates = 0;