summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/btrfs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>2021-11-02 13:49:16 +0100
committerDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>2021-11-16 16:50:23 +0100
commit45da9c1767ac31857df572f0a909fbe88fd5a7e9 (patch)
tree485b3c4d4eea517e01d438bce12d5328f25de30d /fs/btrfs
parentbtrfs: fix a out-of-bound access in copy_compressed_data_to_page() (diff)
downloadlinux-45da9c1767ac31857df572f0a909fbe88fd5a7e9.tar.xz
linux-45da9c1767ac31857df572f0a909fbe88fd5a7e9.zip
btrfs: fix memory ordering between normal and ordered work functions
Ordered work functions aren't guaranteed to be handled by the same thread which executed the normal work functions. The only way execution between normal/ordered functions is synchronized is via the WORK_DONE_BIT, unfortunately the used bitops don't guarantee any ordering whatsoever. This manifested as seemingly inexplicable crashes on ARM64, where async_chunk::inode is seen as non-null in async_cow_submit which causes submit_compressed_extents to be called and crash occurs because async_chunk::inode suddenly became NULL. The call trace was similar to: pc : submit_compressed_extents+0x38/0x3d0 lr : async_cow_submit+0x50/0xd0 sp : ffff800015d4bc20 <registers omitted for brevity> Call trace: submit_compressed_extents+0x38/0x3d0 async_cow_submit+0x50/0xd0 run_ordered_work+0xc8/0x280 btrfs_work_helper+0x98/0x250 process_one_work+0x1f0/0x4ac worker_thread+0x188/0x504 kthread+0x110/0x114 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 Fix this by adding respective barrier calls which ensure that all accesses preceding setting of WORK_DONE_BIT are strictly ordered before setting the flag. At the same time add a read barrier after reading of WORK_DONE_BIT in run_ordered_work which ensures all subsequent loads would be strictly ordered after reading the bit. This in turn ensures are all accesses before WORK_DONE_BIT are going to be strictly ordered before any access that can occur in ordered_func. Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com> Fixes: 08a9ff326418 ("btrfs: Added btrfs_workqueue_struct implemented ordered execution based on kernel workqueue") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011928 Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Tested-by: Chris Murphy <chris@colorremedies.com> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs')
-rw-r--r--fs/btrfs/async-thread.c14
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
index 309516e6a968..43c89952b7d2 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
@@ -234,6 +234,13 @@ static void run_ordered_work(struct __btrfs_workqueue *wq,
ordered_list);
if (!test_bit(WORK_DONE_BIT, &work->flags))
break;
+ /*
+ * Orders all subsequent loads after reading WORK_DONE_BIT,
+ * paired with the smp_mb__before_atomic in btrfs_work_helper
+ * this guarantees that the ordered function will see all
+ * updates from ordinary work function.
+ */
+ smp_rmb();
/*
* we are going to call the ordered done function, but
@@ -317,6 +324,13 @@ static void btrfs_work_helper(struct work_struct *normal_work)
thresh_exec_hook(wq);
work->func(work);
if (need_order) {
+ /*
+ * Ensures all memory accesses done in the work function are
+ * ordered before setting the WORK_DONE_BIT. Ensuring the thread
+ * which is going to executed the ordered work sees them.
+ * Pairs with the smp_rmb in run_ordered_work.
+ */
+ smp_mb__before_atomic();
set_bit(WORK_DONE_BIT, &work->flags);
run_ordered_work(wq, work);
} else {