diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2016-07-28 21:26:31 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2016-07-28 21:26:31 +0200 |
commit | 554828ee0db41618d101d9549db8808af9fd9d65 (patch) | |
tree | 8a3e3022c084f7c7c1eebc494a1b94f0ee0d5cae /fs/dcache.c | |
parent | Add braces to avoid "ambiguous ‘else’" compiler warnings (diff) | |
parent | fs/dcache.c: Save one 32-bit multiply in dcache lookup (diff) | |
download | linux-554828ee0db41618d101d9549db8808af9fd9d65.tar.xz linux-554828ee0db41618d101d9549db8808af9fd9d65.zip |
Merge branch 'salted-string-hash'
This changes the vfs dentry hashing to mix in the parent pointer at the
_beginning_ of the hash, rather than at the end.
That actually improves both the hash and the code generation, because we
can move more of the computation to the "static" part of the dcache
setup, and do less at lookup runtime.
It turns out that a lot of other hash users also really wanted to mix in
a base pointer as a 'salt' for the hash, and so the slightly extended
interface ends up working well for other cases too.
Users that want a string hash that is purely about the string pass in a
'salt' pointer of NULL.
* merge branch 'salted-string-hash':
fs/dcache.c: Save one 32-bit multiply in dcache lookup
vfs: make the string hashes salt the hash
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/dcache.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/dcache.c | 23 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c index d6847d7b123d..24bf27d66f6e 100644 --- a/fs/dcache.c +++ b/fs/dcache.c @@ -104,11 +104,9 @@ static unsigned int d_hash_shift __read_mostly; static struct hlist_bl_head *dentry_hashtable __read_mostly; -static inline struct hlist_bl_head *d_hash(const struct dentry *parent, - unsigned int hash) +static inline struct hlist_bl_head *d_hash(unsigned int hash) { - hash += (unsigned long) parent / L1_CACHE_BYTES; - return dentry_hashtable + hash_32(hash, d_hash_shift); + return dentry_hashtable + (hash >> (32 - d_hash_shift)); } #define IN_LOOKUP_SHIFT 10 @@ -488,7 +486,7 @@ void __d_drop(struct dentry *dentry) if (unlikely(IS_ROOT(dentry))) b = &dentry->d_sb->s_anon; else - b = d_hash(dentry->d_parent, dentry->d_name.hash); + b = d_hash(dentry->d_name.hash); hlist_bl_lock(b); __hlist_bl_del(&dentry->d_hash); @@ -1716,7 +1714,7 @@ struct dentry *d_alloc_name(struct dentry *parent, const char *name) struct qstr q; q.name = name; - q.hash_len = hashlen_string(name); + q.hash_len = hashlen_string(parent, name); return d_alloc(parent, &q); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(d_alloc_name); @@ -2140,7 +2138,7 @@ struct dentry *__d_lookup_rcu(const struct dentry *parent, { u64 hashlen = name->hash_len; const unsigned char *str = name->name; - struct hlist_bl_head *b = d_hash(parent, hashlen_hash(hashlen)); + struct hlist_bl_head *b = d_hash(hashlen_hash(hashlen)); struct hlist_bl_node *node; struct dentry *dentry; @@ -2257,7 +2255,7 @@ struct dentry *__d_lookup(const struct dentry *parent, const struct qstr *name) unsigned int len = name->len; unsigned int hash = name->hash; const unsigned char *str = name->name; - struct hlist_bl_head *b = d_hash(parent, hash); + struct hlist_bl_head *b = d_hash(hash); struct hlist_bl_node *node; struct dentry *found = NULL; struct dentry *dentry; @@ -2337,7 +2335,7 @@ struct dentry *d_hash_and_lookup(struct dentry *dir, struct qstr *name) * calculate the standard hash first, as the d_op->d_hash() * routine may choose to leave the hash value unchanged. */ - name->hash = full_name_hash(name->name, name->len); + name->hash = full_name_hash(dir, name->name, name->len); if (dir->d_flags & DCACHE_OP_HASH) { int err = dir->d_op->d_hash(dir, name); if (unlikely(err < 0)) @@ -2410,7 +2408,7 @@ static void __d_rehash(struct dentry * entry, struct hlist_bl_head *b) static void _d_rehash(struct dentry * entry) { - __d_rehash(entry, d_hash(entry->d_parent, entry->d_name.hash)); + __d_rehash(entry, d_hash(entry->d_name.hash)); } /** @@ -2874,7 +2872,7 @@ static void __d_move(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *target, * for the same hash queue because of how unlikely it is. */ __d_drop(dentry); - __d_rehash(dentry, d_hash(target->d_parent, target->d_name.hash)); + __d_rehash(dentry, d_hash(target->d_name.hash)); /* * Unhash the target (d_delete() is not usable here). If exchanging @@ -2882,8 +2880,7 @@ static void __d_move(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *target, */ __d_drop(target); if (exchange) { - __d_rehash(target, - d_hash(dentry->d_parent, dentry->d_name.hash)); + __d_rehash(target, d_hash(dentry->d_name.hash)); } /* Switch the names.. */ |