summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>2007-07-06 16:53:21 +0200
committerTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>2007-07-11 05:40:48 +0200
commit6f2e64d3e1f661095e274c9d9d47e3f39a6cf1c0 (patch)
tree59bb802bfe2df34ef5666a3d9b7a8f7c21b7247b /fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
parentNFS: Error when mounting the same filesystem with different options (diff)
downloadlinux-6f2e64d3e1f661095e274c9d9d47e3f39a6cf1c0.tar.xz
linux-6f2e64d3e1f661095e274c9d9d47e3f39a6cf1c0.zip
NFSv4: Make the NFS state model work with the nosharedcache mount option
Consider the case where the user has mounted the remote filesystem server:/foo on the two local directories /bar and /baz using the nosharedcache mount option. The files /bar/file and /baz/file are represented by different inodes in the local namespace, but refer to the same file /foo/file on the server. Consider the case where a process opens both /bar/file and /baz/file, then closes /bar/file: because the nfs4_state is not shared between /bar/file and /baz/file, the kernel will see that the nfs4_state for /bar/file is no longer referenced, so it will send off a CLOSE rpc call. Unless the open_owners differ, then that CLOSE call will invalidate the open state on /baz/file too. Conclusion: we cannot share open state owners between two different non-shared mount instances of the same filesystem. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/nfs/nfs4state.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/nfs/nfs4state.c22
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
index 523cc2cbb5e1..e9662ba81d86 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
@@ -156,8 +156,9 @@ static void nfs_free_unique_id(struct rb_root *root, struct nfs_unique_id *id)
}
static struct nfs4_state_owner *
-nfs4_find_state_owner(struct nfs_client *clp, struct rpc_cred *cred)
+nfs4_find_state_owner(struct nfs_server *server, struct rpc_cred *cred)
{
+ struct nfs_client *clp = server->nfs_client;
struct rb_node **p = &clp->cl_state_owners.rb_node,
*parent = NULL;
struct nfs4_state_owner *sp, *res = NULL;
@@ -166,6 +167,14 @@ nfs4_find_state_owner(struct nfs_client *clp, struct rpc_cred *cred)
parent = *p;
sp = rb_entry(parent, struct nfs4_state_owner, so_client_node);
+ if (server < sp->so_server) {
+ p = &parent->rb_left;
+ continue;
+ }
+ if (server > sp->so_server) {
+ p = &parent->rb_right;
+ continue;
+ }
if (cred < sp->so_cred)
p = &parent->rb_left;
else if (cred > sp->so_cred)
@@ -190,6 +199,14 @@ nfs4_insert_state_owner(struct nfs_client *clp, struct nfs4_state_owner *new)
parent = *p;
sp = rb_entry(parent, struct nfs4_state_owner, so_client_node);
+ if (new->so_server < sp->so_server) {
+ p = &parent->rb_left;
+ continue;
+ }
+ if (new->so_server > sp->so_server) {
+ p = &parent->rb_right;
+ continue;
+ }
if (new->so_cred < sp->so_cred)
p = &parent->rb_left;
else if (new->so_cred > sp->so_cred)
@@ -260,7 +277,7 @@ struct nfs4_state_owner *nfs4_get_state_owner(struct nfs_server *server, struct
struct nfs4_state_owner *sp, *new;
spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
- sp = nfs4_find_state_owner(clp, cred);
+ sp = nfs4_find_state_owner(server, cred);
spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
if (sp != NULL)
return sp;
@@ -268,6 +285,7 @@ struct nfs4_state_owner *nfs4_get_state_owner(struct nfs_server *server, struct
if (new == NULL)
return NULL;
new->so_client = clp;
+ new->so_server = server;
new->so_cred = cred;
spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
sp = nfs4_insert_state_owner(clp, new);