diff options
| author | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2017-06-20 12:06:46 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2017-06-20 12:19:14 +0200 |
| commit | 2055da97389a605c8a00d163d40903afbe413921 (patch) | |
| tree | 6aec7243076aab2d4d239f03e34598752ce1512a /fs/nilfs2 | |
| parent | sched/wait: Move bit_wait_table[] and related functionality from sched/core.c... (diff) | |
| download | linux-2055da97389a605c8a00d163d40903afbe413921.tar.xz linux-2055da97389a605c8a00d163d40903afbe413921.zip | |
sched/wait: Disambiguate wq_entry->task_list and wq_head->task_list naming
So I've noticed a number of instances where it was not obvious from the
code whether ->task_list was for a wait-queue head or a wait-queue entry.
Furthermore, there's a number of wait-queue users where the lists are
not for 'tasks' but other entities (poll tables, etc.), in which case
the 'task_list' name is actively confusing.
To clear this all up, name the wait-queue head and entry list structure
fields unambiguously:
struct wait_queue_head::task_list => ::head
struct wait_queue_entry::task_list => ::entry
For example, this code:
rqw->wait.task_list.next != &wait->task_list
... is was pretty unclear (to me) what it's doing, while now it's written this way:
rqw->wait.head.next != &wait->entry
... which makes it pretty clear that we are iterating a list until we see the head.
Other examples are:
list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, next, &x->task_list, task_list) {
list_for_each_entry(wq, &fence->wait.task_list, task_list) {
... where it's unclear (to me) what we are iterating, and during review it's
hard to tell whether it's trying to walk a wait-queue entry (which would be
a bug), while now it's written as:
list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, next, &x->head, entry) {
list_for_each_entry(wq, &fence->wait.head, entry) {
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/nilfs2')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/nilfs2/segment.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c index 775304e7f96f..70ded52dc1dd 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c @@ -2206,8 +2206,7 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_wakeup(struct nilfs_sc_info *sci, int err) unsigned long flags; spin_lock_irqsave(&sci->sc_wait_request.lock, flags); - list_for_each_entry_safe(wrq, n, &sci->sc_wait_request.task_list, - wq.task_list) { + list_for_each_entry_safe(wrq, n, &sci->sc_wait_request.head, wq.entry) { if (!atomic_read(&wrq->done) && nilfs_cnt32_ge(sci->sc_seq_done, wrq->seq)) { wrq->err = err; |