reiserfs: cleanup, reformat comments to normal kernel style

This patch reformats comments in the reiserfs code to fit in 80 columns and
to follow the style rules.

There is no functional change but it helps make my eyes bleed less.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

1 files changed, 39 insertions, 24 deletions

diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/resize.c b/fs/reiserfs/resize.c
index a4ef5cd606eb..037b00c40f1f 100644
--- a/fs/reiserfs/resize.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/resize.c
@@ -53,8 +53,10 @@ int reiserfs_resize(struct super_block *s, unsigned long block_count_new)
 	}
 	bforget(bh);
 
-	/* old disk layout detection; those partitions can be mounted, but
-	 * cannot be resized */
+	/*
+	 * old disk layout detection; those partitions can be mounted, but
+	 * cannot be resized
+	 */
 	if (SB_BUFFER_WITH_SB(s)->b_blocknr * SB_BUFFER_WITH_SB(s)->b_size
 	    != REISERFS_DISK_OFFSET_IN_BYTES) {
 		printk
@@ -86,12 +88,14 @@ int reiserfs_resize(struct super_block *s, unsigned long block_count_new)
 			    ("reiserfs_resize: unable to allocate memory for journal bitmaps\n");
 			return -ENOMEM;
 		}
-		/* the new journal bitmaps are zero filled, now we copy in the bitmap
-		 ** node pointers from the old journal bitmap structs, and then
-		 ** transfer the new data structures into the journal struct.
-		 **
-		 ** using the copy_size var below allows this code to work for
-		 ** both shrinking and expanding the FS.
+		/*
+		 * the new journal bitmaps are zero filled, now we copy i
+		 * the bitmap node pointers from the old journal bitmap
+		 * structs, and then transfer the new data structures
+		 * into the journal struct.
+		 *
+		 * using the copy_size var below allows this code to work for
+		 * both shrinking and expanding the FS.
 		 */
 		copy_size = bmap_nr_new < bmap_nr ? bmap_nr_new : bmap_nr;
 		copy_size =
@@ -101,36 +105,45 @@ int reiserfs_resize(struct super_block *s, unsigned long block_count_new)
 			jb = SB_JOURNAL(s)->j_list_bitmap + i;
 			memcpy(jbitmap[i].bitmaps, jb->bitmaps, copy_size);
 
-			/* just in case vfree schedules on us, copy the new
-			 ** pointer into the journal struct before freeing the
-			 ** old one
+			/*
+			 * just in case vfree schedules on us, copy the new
+			 * pointer into the journal struct before freeing the
+			 * old one
 			 */
 			node_tmp = jb->bitmaps;
 			jb->bitmaps = jbitmap[i].bitmaps;
 			vfree(node_tmp);
 		}
 
-		/* allocate additional bitmap blocks, reallocate array of bitmap
-		 * block pointers */
+		/*
+		 * allocate additional bitmap blocks, reallocate
+		 * array of bitmap block pointers
+		 */
 		bitmap =
 		    vzalloc(sizeof(struct reiserfs_bitmap_info) * bmap_nr_new);
 		if (!bitmap) {
-			/* Journal bitmaps are still supersized, but the memory isn't
-			 * leaked, so I guess it's ok */
+			/*
+			 * Journal bitmaps are still supersized, but the
+			 * memory isn't leaked, so I guess it's ok
+			 */
 			printk("reiserfs_resize: unable to allocate memory.\n");
 			return -ENOMEM;
 		}
 		for (i = 0; i < bmap_nr; i++)
 			bitmap[i] = old_bitmap[i];
 
-		/* This doesn't go through the journal, but it doesn't have to.
-		 * The changes are still atomic: We're synced up when the journal
-		 * transaction begins, and the new bitmaps don't matter if the
-		 * transaction fails. */
+		/*
+		 * This doesn't go through the journal, but it doesn't have to.
+		 * The changes are still atomic: We're synced up when the
+		 * journal transaction begins, and the new bitmaps don't
+		 * matter if the transaction fails.
+		 */
 		for (i = bmap_nr; i < bmap_nr_new; i++) {
 			int depth;
-			/* don't use read_bitmap_block since it will cache
-			 * the uninitialized bitmap */
+			/*
+			 * don't use read_bitmap_block since it will cache
+			 * the uninitialized bitmap
+			 */
 			depth = reiserfs_write_unlock_nested(s);
 			bh = sb_bread(s, i * s->s_blocksize * 8);
 			reiserfs_write_lock_nested(s, depth);
@@ -147,7 +160,7 @@ int reiserfs_resize(struct super_block *s, unsigned long block_count_new)
 			depth = reiserfs_write_unlock_nested(s);
 			sync_dirty_buffer(bh);
 			reiserfs_write_lock_nested(s, depth);
-			// update bitmap_info stuff
+			/* update bitmap_info stuff */
 			bitmap[i].free_count = sb_blocksize(sb) * 8 - 1;
 			brelse(bh);
 		}
@@ -156,9 +169,11 @@ int reiserfs_resize(struct super_block *s, unsigned long block_count_new)
 		vfree(old_bitmap);
 	}
 
-	/* begin transaction, if there was an error, it's fine. Yes, we have
+	/*
+	 * begin transaction, if there was an error, it's fine. Yes, we have
 	 * incorrect bitmaps now, but none of it is ever going to touch the
-	 * disk anyway. */
+	 * disk anyway.
+	 */
 	err = journal_begin(&th, s, 10);
 	if (err)
 		return err;