diff options
author | Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> | 2018-01-05 01:18:09 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2018-01-05 01:45:09 +0100 |
commit | 0cbb4b4f4c44f54af268969b18d8deda63aded59 (patch) | |
tree | e4195e9d5425397f557117077d6306eadf94e350 /fs/userfaultfd.c | |
parent | mm/sparse.c: wrong allocation for mem_section (diff) | |
download | linux-0cbb4b4f4c44f54af268969b18d8deda63aded59.tar.xz linux-0cbb4b4f4c44f54af268969b18d8deda63aded59.zip |
userfaultfd: clear the vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx if UFFD_EVENT_FORK fails
The previous fix in commit 384632e67e08 ("userfaultfd: non-cooperative:
fix fork use after free") corrected the refcounting in case of
UFFD_EVENT_FORK failure for the fork userfault paths.
That still didn't clear the vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx of the vmas that
were set to point to the aborted new uffd ctx earlier in
dup_userfaultfd.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171223002505.593-2-aarcange@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/userfaultfd.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/userfaultfd.c | 20 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c index ac9a4e65ca49..41a75f9f23fd 100644 --- a/fs/userfaultfd.c +++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c @@ -570,11 +570,14 @@ out: static void userfaultfd_event_wait_completion(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx, struct userfaultfd_wait_queue *ewq) { + struct userfaultfd_ctx *release_new_ctx; + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(current->flags & PF_EXITING)) goto out; ewq->ctx = ctx; init_waitqueue_entry(&ewq->wq, current); + release_new_ctx = NULL; spin_lock(&ctx->event_wqh.lock); /* @@ -601,8 +604,7 @@ static void userfaultfd_event_wait_completion(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx, new = (struct userfaultfd_ctx *) (unsigned long) ewq->msg.arg.reserved.reserved1; - - userfaultfd_ctx_put(new); + release_new_ctx = new; } break; } @@ -617,6 +619,20 @@ static void userfaultfd_event_wait_completion(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx, __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); spin_unlock(&ctx->event_wqh.lock); + if (release_new_ctx) { + struct vm_area_struct *vma; + struct mm_struct *mm = release_new_ctx->mm; + + /* the various vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx still points to it */ + down_write(&mm->mmap_sem); + for (vma = mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) + if (vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx.ctx == release_new_ctx) + vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx = NULL_VM_UFFD_CTX; + up_write(&mm->mmap_sem); + + userfaultfd_ctx_put(release_new_ctx); + } + /* * ctx may go away after this if the userfault pseudo fd is * already released. |