diff options
| author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2011-08-07 18:53:20 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2011-08-07 22:42:25 +0200 |
| commit | 7813b94a54987571082ff19e9d87eabbfec23b4e (patch) | |
| tree | f0c6b3325adba97b2af15d7bae55b4babb812f76 /fs | |
| parent | Fix POSIX ACL permission check (diff) | |
| download | linux-7813b94a54987571082ff19e9d87eabbfec23b4e.tar.xz linux-7813b94a54987571082ff19e9d87eabbfec23b4e.zip | |
vfs: rename 'do_follow_link' to 'should_follow_link'
Al points out that the do_follow_link() helper function really is
misnamed - it's about whether we should try to follow a symlink or not,
not about actually doing the following.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/namei.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c index fc13609a354a..2826db35dc25 100644 --- a/fs/namei.c +++ b/fs/namei.c @@ -1267,7 +1267,7 @@ static void terminate_walk(struct nameidata *nd) * so we keep a cache of "no, this doesn't need follow_link" * for the common case. */ -static inline int do_follow_link(struct inode *inode, int follow) +static inline int should_follow_link(struct inode *inode, int follow) { if (unlikely(!(inode->i_opflags & IOP_NOFOLLOW))) { if (likely(inode->i_op->follow_link)) @@ -1303,7 +1303,7 @@ static inline int walk_component(struct nameidata *nd, struct path *path, terminate_walk(nd); return -ENOENT; } - if (do_follow_link(inode, follow)) { + if (should_follow_link(inode, follow)) { if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU) { if (unlikely(unlazy_walk(nd, path->dentry))) { terminate_walk(nd); |