diff options
| author | Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> | 2021-12-09 16:54:29 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> | 2021-12-10 21:56:28 +0100 |
| commit | 78a780602075d8b00c98070fa26e389b3b3efa72 (patch) | |
| tree | 73d7dd6a687297596e8cd9866bab2e3d4efae939 /fs | |
| parent | io-wq: remove spurious bit clear on task_work addition (diff) | |
| download | linux-78a780602075d8b00c98070fa26e389b3b3efa72.tar.xz linux-78a780602075d8b00c98070fa26e389b3b3efa72.zip | |
io_uring: ensure task_work gets run as part of cancelations
If we successfully cancel a work item but that work item needs to be
processed through task_work, then we can be sleeping uninterruptibly
in io_uring_cancel_generic() and never process it. Hence we don't
make forward progress and we end up with an uninterruptible sleep
warning.
While in there, correct a comment that should be IFF, not IIF.
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+21e6887c0be14181206d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/io_uring.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c index c4f217613f56..d5ab0e9a3f29 100644 --- a/fs/io_uring.c +++ b/fs/io_uring.c @@ -9824,7 +9824,7 @@ static __cold void io_uring_drop_tctx_refs(struct task_struct *task) /* * Find any io_uring ctx that this task has registered or done IO on, and cancel - * requests. @sqd should be not-null IIF it's an SQPOLL thread cancellation. + * requests. @sqd should be not-null IFF it's an SQPOLL thread cancellation. */ static __cold void io_uring_cancel_generic(bool cancel_all, struct io_sq_data *sqd) @@ -9866,8 +9866,10 @@ static __cold void io_uring_cancel_generic(bool cancel_all, cancel_all); } - prepare_to_wait(&tctx->wait, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); + prepare_to_wait(&tctx->wait, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); + io_run_task_work(); io_uring_drop_tctx_refs(current); + /* * If we've seen completions, retry without waiting. This * avoids a race where a completion comes in before we did |