diff options
author | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2005-09-10 09:25:56 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org> | 2005-09-10 19:06:21 +0200 |
commit | fb1c8f93d869b34cacb8b8932e2b83d96a19d720 (patch) | |
tree | a006d078aa02e421a7dc4793c335308204859d36 /include/asm-s390/spinlock.h | |
parent | [PATCH] Subject: PATCH: fix numa caused compile warnings (diff) | |
download | linux-fb1c8f93d869b34cacb8b8932e2b83d96a19d720.tar.xz linux-fb1c8f93d869b34cacb8b8932e2b83d96a19d720.zip |
[PATCH] spinlock consolidation
This patch (written by me and also containing many suggestions of Arjan van
de Ven) does a major cleanup of the spinlock code. It does the following
things:
- consolidates and enhances the spinlock/rwlock debugging code
- simplifies the asm/spinlock.h files
- encapsulates the raw spinlock type and moves generic spinlock
features (such as ->break_lock) into the generic code.
- cleans up the spinlock code hierarchy to get rid of the spaghetti.
Most notably there's now only a single variant of the debugging code,
located in lib/spinlock_debug.c. (previously we had one SMP debugging
variant per architecture, plus a separate generic one for UP builds)
Also, i've enhanced the rwlock debugging facility, it will now track
write-owners. There is new spinlock-owner/CPU-tracking on SMP builds too.
All locks have lockup detection now, which will work for both soft and hard
spin/rwlock lockups.
The arch-level include files now only contain the minimally necessary
subset of the spinlock code - all the rest that can be generalized now
lives in the generic headers:
include/asm-i386/spinlock_types.h | 16
include/asm-x86_64/spinlock_types.h | 16
I have also split up the various spinlock variants into separate files,
making it easier to see which does what. The new layout is:
SMP | UP
----------------------------|-----------------------------------
asm/spinlock_types_smp.h | linux/spinlock_types_up.h
linux/spinlock_types.h | linux/spinlock_types.h
asm/spinlock_smp.h | linux/spinlock_up.h
linux/spinlock_api_smp.h | linux/spinlock_api_up.h
linux/spinlock.h | linux/spinlock.h
/*
* here's the role of the various spinlock/rwlock related include files:
*
* on SMP builds:
*
* asm/spinlock_types.h: contains the raw_spinlock_t/raw_rwlock_t and the
* initializers
*
* linux/spinlock_types.h:
* defines the generic type and initializers
*
* asm/spinlock.h: contains the __raw_spin_*()/etc. lowlevel
* implementations, mostly inline assembly code
*
* (also included on UP-debug builds:)
*
* linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:
* contains the prototypes for the _spin_*() APIs.
*
* linux/spinlock.h: builds the final spin_*() APIs.
*
* on UP builds:
*
* linux/spinlock_type_up.h:
* contains the generic, simplified UP spinlock type.
* (which is an empty structure on non-debug builds)
*
* linux/spinlock_types.h:
* defines the generic type and initializers
*
* linux/spinlock_up.h:
* contains the __raw_spin_*()/etc. version of UP
* builds. (which are NOPs on non-debug, non-preempt
* builds)
*
* (included on UP-non-debug builds:)
*
* linux/spinlock_api_up.h:
* builds the _spin_*() APIs.
*
* linux/spinlock.h: builds the final spin_*() APIs.
*/
All SMP and UP architectures are converted by this patch.
arm, i386, ia64, ppc, ppc64, s390/s390x, x64 was build-tested via
crosscompilers. m32r, mips, sh, sparc, have not been tested yet, but should
be mostly fine.
From: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
Booted and lightly tested on a500-44 (64-bit, SMP kernel, dual CPU).
Builds 32-bit SMP kernel (not booted or tested). I did not try to build
non-SMP kernels. That should be trivial to fix up later if necessary.
I converted bit ops atomic_hash lock to raw_spinlock_t. Doing so avoids
some ugly nesting of linux/*.h and asm/*.h files. Those particular locks
are well tested and contained entirely inside arch specific code. I do NOT
expect any new issues to arise with them.
If someone does ever need to use debug/metrics with them, then they will
need to unravel this hairball between spinlocks, atomic ops, and bit ops
that exist only because parisc has exactly one atomic instruction: LDCW
(load and clear word).
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
ia64 fix
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Hirokazu Takata <takata@linux-m32r.org>
Signed-off-by: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>
Signed-off-by: Benoit Boissinot <benoit.boissinot@ens-lyon.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/asm-s390/spinlock.h')
-rw-r--r-- | include/asm-s390/spinlock.h | 63 |
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 40 deletions
diff --git a/include/asm-s390/spinlock.h b/include/asm-s390/spinlock.h index 321b23bba1ec..273dbecf8ace 100644 --- a/include/asm-s390/spinlock.h +++ b/include/asm-s390/spinlock.h @@ -27,25 +27,19 @@ _raw_compare_and_swap(volatile unsigned int *lock, * on the local processor, one does not. * * We make no fairness assumptions. They have a cost. + * + * (the type definitions are in asm/spinlock_types.h) */ -typedef struct { - volatile unsigned int lock; -#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT - unsigned int break_lock; -#endif -} __attribute__ ((aligned (4))) spinlock_t; - -#define SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED (spinlock_t) { 0 } -#define spin_lock_init(lp) do { (lp)->lock = 0; } while(0) -#define spin_unlock_wait(lp) do { barrier(); } while(((volatile spinlock_t *)(lp))->lock) -#define spin_is_locked(x) ((x)->lock != 0) -#define _raw_spin_lock_flags(lock, flags) _raw_spin_lock(lock) +#define __raw_spin_is_locked(x) ((x)->lock != 0) +#define __raw_spin_lock_flags(lock, flags) __raw_spin_lock(lock) +#define __raw_spin_unlock_wait(lock) \ + do { while (__raw_spin_is_locked(lock)) cpu_relax(); } while (0) -extern void _raw_spin_lock_wait(spinlock_t *lp, unsigned int pc); -extern int _raw_spin_trylock_retry(spinlock_t *lp, unsigned int pc); +extern void _raw_spin_lock_wait(raw_spinlock_t *lp, unsigned int pc); +extern int _raw_spin_trylock_retry(raw_spinlock_t *lp, unsigned int pc); -static inline void _raw_spin_lock(spinlock_t *lp) +static inline void __raw_spin_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lp) { unsigned long pc = 1 | (unsigned long) __builtin_return_address(0); @@ -53,7 +47,7 @@ static inline void _raw_spin_lock(spinlock_t *lp) _raw_spin_lock_wait(lp, pc); } -static inline int _raw_spin_trylock(spinlock_t *lp) +static inline int __raw_spin_trylock(raw_spinlock_t *lp) { unsigned long pc = 1 | (unsigned long) __builtin_return_address(0); @@ -62,7 +56,7 @@ static inline int _raw_spin_trylock(spinlock_t *lp) return _raw_spin_trylock_retry(lp, pc); } -static inline void _raw_spin_unlock(spinlock_t *lp) +static inline void __raw_spin_unlock(raw_spinlock_t *lp) { _raw_compare_and_swap(&lp->lock, lp->lock, 0); } @@ -77,36 +71,25 @@ static inline void _raw_spin_unlock(spinlock_t *lp) * irq-safe write-lock, but readers can get non-irqsafe * read-locks. */ -typedef struct { - volatile unsigned int lock; - volatile unsigned long owner_pc; -#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT - unsigned int break_lock; -#endif -} rwlock_t; - -#define RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED (rwlock_t) { 0, 0 } - -#define rwlock_init(x) do { *(x) = RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED; } while(0) /** * read_can_lock - would read_trylock() succeed? * @lock: the rwlock in question. */ -#define read_can_lock(x) ((int)(x)->lock >= 0) +#define __raw_read_can_lock(x) ((int)(x)->lock >= 0) /** * write_can_lock - would write_trylock() succeed? * @lock: the rwlock in question. */ -#define write_can_lock(x) ((x)->lock == 0) +#define __raw_write_can_lock(x) ((x)->lock == 0) -extern void _raw_read_lock_wait(rwlock_t *lp); -extern int _raw_read_trylock_retry(rwlock_t *lp); -extern void _raw_write_lock_wait(rwlock_t *lp); -extern int _raw_write_trylock_retry(rwlock_t *lp); +extern void _raw_read_lock_wait(raw_rwlock_t *lp); +extern int _raw_read_trylock_retry(raw_rwlock_t *lp); +extern void _raw_write_lock_wait(raw_rwlock_t *lp); +extern int _raw_write_trylock_retry(raw_rwlock_t *lp); -static inline void _raw_read_lock(rwlock_t *rw) +static inline void __raw_read_lock(raw_rwlock_t *rw) { unsigned int old; old = rw->lock & 0x7fffffffU; @@ -114,7 +97,7 @@ static inline void _raw_read_lock(rwlock_t *rw) _raw_read_lock_wait(rw); } -static inline void _raw_read_unlock(rwlock_t *rw) +static inline void __raw_read_unlock(raw_rwlock_t *rw) { unsigned int old, cmp; @@ -125,18 +108,18 @@ static inline void _raw_read_unlock(rwlock_t *rw) } while (cmp != old); } -static inline void _raw_write_lock(rwlock_t *rw) +static inline void __raw_write_lock(raw_rwlock_t *rw) { if (unlikely(_raw_compare_and_swap(&rw->lock, 0, 0x80000000) != 0)) _raw_write_lock_wait(rw); } -static inline void _raw_write_unlock(rwlock_t *rw) +static inline void __raw_write_unlock(raw_rwlock_t *rw) { _raw_compare_and_swap(&rw->lock, 0x80000000, 0); } -static inline int _raw_read_trylock(rwlock_t *rw) +static inline int __raw_read_trylock(raw_rwlock_t *rw) { unsigned int old; old = rw->lock & 0x7fffffffU; @@ -145,7 +128,7 @@ static inline int _raw_read_trylock(rwlock_t *rw) return _raw_read_trylock_retry(rw); } -static inline int _raw_write_trylock(rwlock_t *rw) +static inline int __raw_write_trylock(raw_rwlock_t *rw) { if (likely(_raw_compare_and_swap(&rw->lock, 0, 0x80000000) == 0)) return 1; |