diff options
| author | Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> | 2016-10-19 15:57:08 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2016-10-19 16:38:08 +0200 |
| commit | e4961b0768852d9eb7383e1a5df178eacb714656 (patch) | |
| tree | b749c31fe4ef865047c57a693c4374661281cdbf /include | |
| parent | flow_dissector: Check skb for VLAN only if skb specified. (diff) | |
| download | linux-e4961b0768852d9eb7383e1a5df178eacb714656.tar.xz linux-e4961b0768852d9eb7383e1a5df178eacb714656.zip | |
net: core: Correctly iterate over lower adjacency list
Tamir reported the following trace when processing ARP requests received
via a vlan device on top of a VLAN-aware bridge:
NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s! [swapper/1:0]
[...]
CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Tainted: G W 4.8.0-rc7 #1
Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. "MSN2100-CB2F"/"SA001017", BIOS 5.6.5 06/07/2016
task: ffff88017edfea40 task.stack: ffff88017ee10000
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff815dcc73>] [<ffffffff815dcc73>] netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu+0x33/0x60
[...]
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
[<ffffffffa015de0a>] mlxsw_sp_port_lower_dev_hold+0x5a/0xa0 [mlxsw_spectrum]
[<ffffffffa016f1b0>] mlxsw_sp_router_netevent_event+0x80/0x150 [mlxsw_spectrum]
[<ffffffff810ad07a>] notifier_call_chain+0x4a/0x70
[<ffffffff810ad13a>] atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x1a/0x20
[<ffffffff815ee77b>] call_netevent_notifiers+0x1b/0x20
[<ffffffff815f2eb6>] neigh_update+0x306/0x740
[<ffffffff815f38ce>] neigh_event_ns+0x4e/0xb0
[<ffffffff8165ea3f>] arp_process+0x66f/0x700
[<ffffffff8170214c>] ? common_interrupt+0x8c/0x8c
[<ffffffff8165ec29>] arp_rcv+0x139/0x1d0
[<ffffffff816e505a>] ? vlan_do_receive+0xda/0x320
[<ffffffff815e3794>] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x524/0xab0
[<ffffffff815e6830>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x10/0x20
[<ffffffffa06d612d>] ? br_forward_finish+0x3d/0xc0 [bridge]
[<ffffffffa06e5796>] ? br_handle_vlan+0xf6/0x1b0 [bridge]
[<ffffffff815e3d38>] __netif_receive_skb+0x18/0x60
[<ffffffff815e3dc0>] netif_receive_skb_internal+0x40/0xb0
[<ffffffff815e3e4c>] netif_receive_skb+0x1c/0x70
[<ffffffffa06d7856>] br_pass_frame_up+0xc6/0x160 [bridge]
[<ffffffffa06d63d7>] ? deliver_clone+0x37/0x50 [bridge]
[<ffffffffa06d656c>] ? br_flood+0xcc/0x160 [bridge]
[<ffffffffa06d7b14>] br_handle_frame_finish+0x224/0x4f0 [bridge]
[<ffffffffa06d7f94>] br_handle_frame+0x174/0x300 [bridge]
[<ffffffff815e3599>] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x329/0xab0
[<ffffffff81374815>] ? find_next_bit+0x15/0x20
[<ffffffff8135e802>] ? cpumask_next_and+0x32/0x50
[<ffffffff810c9968>] ? load_balance+0x178/0x9b0
[<ffffffff815e3d38>] __netif_receive_skb+0x18/0x60
[<ffffffff815e3dc0>] netif_receive_skb_internal+0x40/0xb0
[<ffffffff815e3e4c>] netif_receive_skb+0x1c/0x70
[<ffffffffa01544a1>] mlxsw_sp_rx_listener_func+0x61/0xb0 [mlxsw_spectrum]
[<ffffffffa005c9f7>] mlxsw_core_skb_receive+0x187/0x200 [mlxsw_core]
[<ffffffffa007332a>] mlxsw_pci_cq_tasklet+0x63a/0x9b0 [mlxsw_pci]
[<ffffffff81091986>] tasklet_action+0xf6/0x110
[<ffffffff81704556>] __do_softirq+0xf6/0x280
[<ffffffff8109213f>] irq_exit+0xdf/0xf0
[<ffffffff817042b4>] do_IRQ+0x54/0xd0
[<ffffffff8170214c>] common_interrupt+0x8c/0x8c
The problem is that netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu() never advances the
iterator, thereby causing the loop over the lower adjacency list to run
forever.
Fix this by advancing the iterator and avoid the infinite loop.
Fixes: 7ce856aaaf13 ("mlxsw: spectrum: Add couple of lower device helper functions")
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Reported-by: Tamir Winetroub <tamirw@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'include')
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/netdevice.h | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h index 136ae6bbe81e..465e128699a1 100644 --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h @@ -3877,7 +3877,7 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu(struct net_device *dev, ldev = netdev_all_lower_get_next(dev, &(iter))) #define netdev_for_each_all_lower_dev_rcu(dev, ldev, iter) \ - for (iter = (dev)->all_adj_list.lower.next, \ + for (iter = &(dev)->all_adj_list.lower, \ ldev = netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu(dev, &(iter)); \ ldev; \ ldev = netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu(dev, &(iter))) |