ipc/sem.c: add a per-semaphore pending list

Based on Nick's findings:

sysv sem has the concept of semaphore arrays that consist out of multiple
semaphores.  Atomic operations that affect multiple semaphores are
supported.

The patch is the first step for optimizing simple, single semaphore
operations: In addition to the global list of all pending operations, a
2nd, per-semaphore list with the simple operations is added.

Note: this patch does not make sense by itself, the new list is used
nowhere.

Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Pierre Peiffer <peifferp@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 32 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
index eac3f46a5968..4252a8eb77e2 100644
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -241,6 +241,7 @@ static int newary(struct ipc_namespace *ns, struct ipc_params *params)
 	key_t key = params->key;
 	int nsems = params->u.nsems;
 	int semflg = params->flg;
+	int i;
 
 	if (!nsems)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -273,6 +274,11 @@ static int newary(struct ipc_namespace *ns, struct ipc_params *params)
 	ns->used_sems += nsems;
 
 	sma->sem_base = (struct sem *) &sma[1];
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nsems; i++)
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sma->sem_base[i].sem_pending);
+
+	sma->complex_count = 0;
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sma->sem_pending);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sma->list_id);
 	sma->sem_nsems = nsems;
@@ -419,6 +425,15 @@ static void wake_up_sem_queue(struct sem_queue *q, int error)
 	preempt_enable();
 }
 
+static void unlink_queue(struct sem_array *sma, struct sem_queue *q)
+{
+	list_del(&q->list);
+	if (q->nsops == 1)
+		list_del(&q->simple_list);
+	else
+		sma->complex_count--;
+}
+
 /* Go through the pending queue for the indicated semaphore
  * looking for tasks that can be completed.
  */
@@ -438,7 +453,7 @@ again:
 		if (error > 0)
 			continue;
 
-		list_del(&q->list);
+		unlink_queue(sma, q);
 
 		/*
 		 * The next operation that must be checked depends on the type
@@ -532,8 +547,7 @@ static void freeary(struct ipc_namespace *ns, struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp)
 
 	/* Wake up all pending processes and let them fail with EIDRM. */
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(q, tq, &sma->sem_pending, list) {
-		list_del(&q->list);
-
+		unlink_queue(sma, q);
 		wake_up_sem_queue(q, -EIDRM);
 	}
 
@@ -1191,6 +1205,19 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(semtimedop, int, semid, struct sembuf __user *, tsops,
 	else
 		list_add(&queue.list, &sma->sem_pending);
 
+	if (nsops == 1) {
+		struct sem *curr;
+		curr = &sma->sem_base[sops->sem_num];
+
+		if (alter)
+			list_add_tail(&queue.simple_list, &curr->sem_pending);
+		else
+			list_add(&queue.simple_list, &curr->sem_pending);
+	} else {
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&queue.simple_list);
+		sma->complex_count++;
+	}
+
 	queue.status = -EINTR;
 	queue.sleeper = current;
 	current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
@@ -1232,7 +1259,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(semtimedop, int, semid, struct sembuf __user *, tsops,
 	 */
 	if (timeout && jiffies_left == 0)
 		error = -EAGAIN;
-	list_del(&queue.list);
+	unlink_queue(sma, &queue);
 
 out_unlock_free:
 	sem_unlock(sma);
@@ -1375,7 +1402,7 @@ static int sysvipc_sem_proc_show(struct seq_file *s, void *it)
 	struct sem_array *sma = it;
 
 	return seq_printf(s,
-			  "%10d %10d  %4o %10lu %5u %5u %5u %5u %10lu %10lu\n",
+			  "%10d %10d  %4o %10u %5u %5u %5u %5u %10lu %10lu\n",
 			  sma->sem_perm.key,
 			  sma->sem_perm.id,
 			  sma->sem_perm.mode,