summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/bpf
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>2017-03-22 18:00:32 +0100
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2017-03-22 23:45:45 +0100
commitfad73a1a35ea61f13607a391aca669caad8c04ca (patch)
tree1070c51ee7354ee35ef1e23f17b7ce483c316144 /kernel/bpf
parentnet: stmmac: fix dma operation mode config for older versions (diff)
downloadlinux-fad73a1a35ea61f13607a391aca669caad8c04ca.tar.xz
linux-fad73a1a35ea61f13607a391aca669caad8c04ca.zip
bpf: Fix and simplifications on inline map lookup
Fix in verifier: For the same bpf_map_lookup_elem() instruction (i.e. "call 1"), a broken case is "a different type of map could be used for the same lookup instruction". For example, an array in one case and a hashmap in another. We have to resort to the old dynamic call behavior in this case. The fix is to check for collision on insn_aux->map_ptr. If there is collision, don't inline the map lookup. Please see the "do_reg_lookup()" in test_map_in_map_kern.c in the later patch for how-to trigger the above case. Simplifications on array_map_gen_lookup(): 1. Calculate elem_size from map->value_size. It removes the need for 'struct bpf_array' which makes the later map-in-map implementation easier. 2. Remove the 'elem_size == 1' test Fixes: 81ed18ab3098 ("bpf: add helper inlining infra and optimize map_array lookup") Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf')
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/arraymap.c11
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/verifier.c13
2 files changed, 15 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
index bcf9955fac95..4d7d5d0ed76a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
@@ -117,20 +117,17 @@ static void *array_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
/* emit BPF instructions equivalent to C code of array_map_lookup_elem() */
static u32 array_map_gen_lookup(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_insn *insn_buf)
{
- struct bpf_array *array = container_of(map, struct bpf_array, map);
struct bpf_insn *insn = insn_buf;
- u32 elem_size = array->elem_size;
+ u32 elem_size = round_up(map->value_size, 8);
const int ret = BPF_REG_0;
const int map_ptr = BPF_REG_1;
const int index = BPF_REG_2;
*insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, map_ptr, offsetof(struct bpf_array, value));
*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, ret, index, 0);
- *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, ret, array->map.max_entries,
- elem_size == 1 ? 2 : 3);
- if (elem_size == 1) {
- /* nop */
- } else if (is_power_of_2(elem_size)) {
+ *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, ret, map->max_entries, 3);
+
+ if (is_power_of_2(elem_size)) {
*insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, ret, ilog2(elem_size));
} else {
*insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MUL, ret, elem_size);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 90bf46787603..9bf82267f2f9 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -143,6 +143,8 @@ struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem {
#define BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_INSNS 65536
#define BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_STACK 1024
+#define BPF_MAP_PTR_POISON ((void *)0xeB9F + POISON_POINTER_DELTA)
+
struct bpf_call_arg_meta {
struct bpf_map *map_ptr;
bool raw_mode;
@@ -1357,6 +1359,8 @@ static int check_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn_idx)
} else if (fn->ret_type == RET_VOID) {
regs[BPF_REG_0].type = NOT_INIT;
} else if (fn->ret_type == RET_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL) {
+ struct bpf_insn_aux_data *insn_aux;
+
regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL;
regs[BPF_REG_0].max_value = regs[BPF_REG_0].min_value = 0;
/* remember map_ptr, so that check_map_access()
@@ -1369,7 +1373,11 @@ static int check_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn_idx)
}
regs[BPF_REG_0].map_ptr = meta.map_ptr;
regs[BPF_REG_0].id = ++env->id_gen;
- env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].map_ptr = meta.map_ptr;
+ insn_aux = &env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx];
+ if (!insn_aux->map_ptr)
+ insn_aux->map_ptr = meta.map_ptr;
+ else if (insn_aux->map_ptr != meta.map_ptr)
+ insn_aux->map_ptr = BPF_MAP_PTR_POISON;
} else {
verbose("unknown return type %d of func %s#%d\n",
fn->ret_type, func_id_name(func_id), func_id);
@@ -3307,7 +3315,8 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
if (ebpf_jit_enabled() && insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem) {
map_ptr = env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].map_ptr;
- if (!map_ptr->ops->map_gen_lookup)
+ if (map_ptr == BPF_MAP_PTR_POISON ||
+ !map_ptr->ops->map_gen_lookup)
goto patch_call_imm;
cnt = map_ptr->ops->map_gen_lookup(map_ptr, insn_buf);