summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/bpf
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>2015-03-05 23:27:51 +0100
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2015-03-07 03:50:55 +0100
commit3ba67dabaa58e3223325f0a813a6e830fb5f5cc5 (patch)
tree96e4798c1ed9bcaf56f8e7db339544facdb8703d /kernel/bpf
parentnet: gro: remove obsolete code from skb_gro_receive() (diff)
downloadlinux-3ba67dabaa58e3223325f0a813a6e830fb5f5cc5.tar.xz
linux-3ba67dabaa58e3223325f0a813a6e830fb5f5cc5.zip
ebpf: bpf_map_*: fix linker error on avr32 and openrisc arch
Fengguang reported, that on openrisc and avr32 architectures, we get the following linker errors on *_defconfig builds that have no bpf syscall support: net/built-in.o:(.rodata+0x1cd0): undefined reference to `bpf_map_lookup_elem_proto' net/built-in.o:(.rodata+0x1cd4): undefined reference to `bpf_map_update_elem_proto' net/built-in.o:(.rodata+0x1cd8): undefined reference to `bpf_map_delete_elem_proto' Fix it up by providing built-in weak definitions of the symbols, so they can be overridden when the syscall is enabled. I think the issue might be that gcc is not able to optimize all that away. This patch fixes the linker errors for me, tested with Fengguang's make.cross [1] script. [1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Fixes: d4052c4aea0c ("ebpf: remove CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL ifdefs in socket filter code") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf')
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/core.c5
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index a64e7a207d2b..50603aec766a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -656,6 +656,11 @@ void bpf_prog_free(struct bpf_prog *fp)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_prog_free);
+/* Weak definitions of helper functions in case we don't have bpf syscall. */
+const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_lookup_elem_proto __weak;
+const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_update_elem_proto __weak;
+const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_delete_elem_proto __weak;
+
/* To execute LD_ABS/LD_IND instructions __bpf_prog_run() may call
* skb_copy_bits(), so provide a weak definition of it for NET-less config.
*/