Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://selinuxproject.org/~jmorris/linux-security

* 'for-linus' of git://selinuxproject.org/~jmorris/linux-security:
  capabilities: remove __cap_full_set definition
  security: remove the security_netlink_recv hook as it is equivalent to capable()
  ptrace: do not audit capability check when outputing /proc/pid/stat
  capabilities: remove task_ns_* functions
  capabitlies: ns_capable can use the cap helpers rather than lsm call
  capabilities: style only - move capable below ns_capable
  capabilites: introduce new has_ns_capabilities_noaudit
  capabilities: call has_ns_capability from has_capability
  capabilities: remove all _real_ interfaces
  capabilities: introduce security_capable_noaudit
  capabilities: reverse arguments to security_capable
  capabilities: remove the task from capable LSM hook entirely
  selinux: sparse fix: fix several warnings in the security server cod
  selinux: sparse fix: fix warnings in netlink code
  selinux: sparse fix: eliminate warnings for selinuxfs
  selinux: sparse fix: declare selinux_disable() in security.h
  selinux: sparse fix: move selinux_complete_init
  selinux: sparse fix: make selinux_secmark_refcount static
  SELinux: Fix RCU deref check warning in sel_netport_insert()

Manually fix up a semantic mis-merge wrt security_netlink_recv():

 - the interface was removed in commit fd7784615248 ("security: remove
   the security_netlink_recv hook as it is equivalent to capable()")

 - a new user of it appeared in commit a38f7907b926 ("crypto: Add
   userspace configuration API")

causing no automatic merge conflict, but Eric Paris pointed out the
issue.

1 files changed, 46 insertions, 34 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/capability.c b/kernel/capability.c
index b463871a4e69..0fcf1c14a297 100644
--- a/kernel/capability.c
+++ b/kernel/capability.c
@@ -287,74 +287,84 @@ error:
 }
 
 /**
- * has_capability - Does a task have a capability in init_user_ns
+ * has_ns_capability - Does a task have a capability in a specific user ns
  * @t: The task in question
+ * @ns: target user namespace
  * @cap: The capability to be tested for
  *
  * Return true if the specified task has the given superior capability
- * currently in effect to the initial user namespace, false if not.
+ * currently in effect to the specified user namespace, false if not.
  *
  * Note that this does not set PF_SUPERPRIV on the task.
  */
-bool has_capability(struct task_struct *t, int cap)
+bool has_ns_capability(struct task_struct *t,
+		       struct user_namespace *ns, int cap)
 {
-	int ret = security_real_capable(t, &init_user_ns, cap);
+	int ret;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	ret = security_capable(__task_cred(t), ns, cap);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	return (ret == 0);
 }
 
 /**
- * has_capability - Does a task have a capability in a specific user ns
+ * has_capability - Does a task have a capability in init_user_ns
  * @t: The task in question
- * @ns: target user namespace
  * @cap: The capability to be tested for
  *
  * Return true if the specified task has the given superior capability
- * currently in effect to the specified user namespace, false if not.
+ * currently in effect to the initial user namespace, false if not.
  *
  * Note that this does not set PF_SUPERPRIV on the task.
  */
-bool has_ns_capability(struct task_struct *t,
-		       struct user_namespace *ns, int cap)
+bool has_capability(struct task_struct *t, int cap)
 {
-	int ret = security_real_capable(t, ns, cap);
-
-	return (ret == 0);
+	return has_ns_capability(t, &init_user_ns, cap);
 }
 
 /**
- * has_capability_noaudit - Does a task have a capability (unaudited)
+ * has_ns_capability_noaudit - Does a task have a capability (unaudited)
+ * in a specific user ns.
  * @t: The task in question
+ * @ns: target user namespace
  * @cap: The capability to be tested for
  *
  * Return true if the specified task has the given superior capability
- * currently in effect to init_user_ns, false if not.  Don't write an
- * audit message for the check.
+ * currently in effect to the specified user namespace, false if not.
+ * Do not write an audit message for the check.
  *
  * Note that this does not set PF_SUPERPRIV on the task.
  */
-bool has_capability_noaudit(struct task_struct *t, int cap)
+bool has_ns_capability_noaudit(struct task_struct *t,
+			       struct user_namespace *ns, int cap)
 {
-	int ret = security_real_capable_noaudit(t, &init_user_ns, cap);
+	int ret;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	ret = security_capable_noaudit(__task_cred(t), ns, cap);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	return (ret == 0);
 }
 
 /**
- * capable - Determine if the current task has a superior capability in effect
+ * has_capability_noaudit - Does a task have a capability (unaudited) in the
+ * initial user ns
+ * @t: The task in question
  * @cap: The capability to be tested for
  *
- * Return true if the current task has the given superior capability currently
- * available for use, false if not.
+ * Return true if the specified task has the given superior capability
+ * currently in effect to init_user_ns, false if not.  Don't write an
+ * audit message for the check.
  *
- * This sets PF_SUPERPRIV on the task if the capability is available on the
- * assumption that it's about to be used.
+ * Note that this does not set PF_SUPERPRIV on the task.
  */
-bool capable(int cap)
+bool has_capability_noaudit(struct task_struct *t, int cap)
 {
-	return ns_capable(&init_user_ns, cap);
+	return has_ns_capability_noaudit(t, &init_user_ns, cap);
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(capable);
 
 /**
  * ns_capable - Determine if the current task has a superior capability in effect
@@ -374,7 +384,7 @@ bool ns_capable(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap)
 		BUG();
 	}
 
-	if (security_capable(ns, current_cred(), cap) == 0) {
+	if (has_ns_capability(current, ns, cap)) {
 		current->flags |= PF_SUPERPRIV;
 		return true;
 	}
@@ -383,18 +393,20 @@ bool ns_capable(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ns_capable);
 
 /**
- * task_ns_capable - Determine whether current task has a superior
- * capability targeted at a specific task's user namespace.
- * @t: The task whose user namespace is targeted.
- * @cap: The capability in question.
+ * capable - Determine if the current task has a superior capability in effect
+ * @cap: The capability to be tested for
+ *
+ * Return true if the current task has the given superior capability currently
+ * available for use, false if not.
  *
- *  Return true if it does, false otherwise.
+ * This sets PF_SUPERPRIV on the task if the capability is available on the
+ * assumption that it's about to be used.
  */
-bool task_ns_capable(struct task_struct *t, int cap)
+bool capable(int cap)
 {
-	return ns_capable(task_cred_xxx(t, user)->user_ns, cap);
+	return ns_capable(&init_user_ns, cap);
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(task_ns_capable);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(capable);
 
 /**
  * nsown_capable - Check superior capability to one's own user_ns