diff options
author | Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com> | 2019-08-12 20:43:02 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2019-08-19 12:22:19 +0200 |
commit | f1c6ece23729257fb46562ff9224cf5f61b818da (patch) | |
tree | bc468dd8660cfa173579c9348213572cbb4e73e0 /kernel/kprobes.c | |
parent | perf/x86: Fix typo in comment (diff) | |
download | linux-f1c6ece23729257fb46562ff9224cf5f61b818da.tar.xz linux-f1c6ece23729257fb46562ff9224cf5f61b818da.zip |
kprobes: Fix potential deadlock in kprobe_optimizer()
lockdep reports the following deadlock scenario:
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
kworker/1:1/48 is trying to acquire lock:
000000008d7a62b2 (text_mutex){+.+.}, at: kprobe_optimizer+0x163/0x290
but task is already holding lock:
00000000850b5e2d (module_mutex){+.+.}, at: kprobe_optimizer+0x31/0x290
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (module_mutex){+.+.}:
__mutex_lock+0xac/0x9f0
mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
set_all_modules_text_rw+0x22/0x90
ftrace_arch_code_modify_prepare+0x1c/0x20
ftrace_run_update_code+0xe/0x30
ftrace_startup_enable+0x2e/0x50
ftrace_startup+0xa7/0x100
register_ftrace_function+0x27/0x70
arm_kprobe+0xb3/0x130
enable_kprobe+0x83/0xa0
enable_trace_kprobe.part.0+0x2e/0x80
kprobe_register+0x6f/0xc0
perf_trace_event_init+0x16b/0x270
perf_kprobe_init+0xa7/0xe0
perf_kprobe_event_init+0x3e/0x70
perf_try_init_event+0x4a/0x140
perf_event_alloc+0x93a/0xde0
__do_sys_perf_event_open+0x19f/0xf30
__x64_sys_perf_event_open+0x20/0x30
do_syscall_64+0x65/0x1d0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
-> #0 (text_mutex){+.+.}:
__lock_acquire+0xfcb/0x1b60
lock_acquire+0xca/0x1d0
__mutex_lock+0xac/0x9f0
mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
kprobe_optimizer+0x163/0x290
process_one_work+0x22b/0x560
worker_thread+0x50/0x3c0
kthread+0x112/0x150
ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(module_mutex);
lock(text_mutex);
lock(module_mutex);
lock(text_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
As a reproducer I've been using bcc's funccount.py
(https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/blob/master/tools/funccount.py),
for example:
# ./funccount.py '*interrupt*'
That immediately triggers the lockdep splat.
Fix by acquiring text_mutex before module_mutex in kprobe_optimizer().
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: d5b844a2cf50 ("ftrace/x86: Remove possible deadlock between register_kprobe() and ftrace_run_update_code()")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190812184302.GA7010@xps-13
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/kprobes.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/kprobes.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c index 9873fc627d61..d9770a5393c8 100644 --- a/kernel/kprobes.c +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c @@ -470,6 +470,7 @@ static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(optimizing_work, kprobe_optimizer); */ static void do_optimize_kprobes(void) { + lockdep_assert_held(&text_mutex); /* * The optimization/unoptimization refers online_cpus via * stop_machine() and cpu-hotplug modifies online_cpus. @@ -487,9 +488,7 @@ static void do_optimize_kprobes(void) list_empty(&optimizing_list)) return; - mutex_lock(&text_mutex); arch_optimize_kprobes(&optimizing_list); - mutex_unlock(&text_mutex); } /* @@ -500,6 +499,7 @@ static void do_unoptimize_kprobes(void) { struct optimized_kprobe *op, *tmp; + lockdep_assert_held(&text_mutex); /* See comment in do_optimize_kprobes() */ lockdep_assert_cpus_held(); @@ -507,7 +507,6 @@ static void do_unoptimize_kprobes(void) if (list_empty(&unoptimizing_list)) return; - mutex_lock(&text_mutex); arch_unoptimize_kprobes(&unoptimizing_list, &freeing_list); /* Loop free_list for disarming */ list_for_each_entry_safe(op, tmp, &freeing_list, list) { @@ -524,7 +523,6 @@ static void do_unoptimize_kprobes(void) } else list_del_init(&op->list); } - mutex_unlock(&text_mutex); } /* Reclaim all kprobes on the free_list */ @@ -556,6 +554,7 @@ static void kprobe_optimizer(struct work_struct *work) { mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex); cpus_read_lock(); + mutex_lock(&text_mutex); /* Lock modules while optimizing kprobes */ mutex_lock(&module_mutex); @@ -583,6 +582,7 @@ static void kprobe_optimizer(struct work_struct *work) do_free_cleaned_kprobes(); mutex_unlock(&module_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&text_mutex); cpus_read_unlock(); mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex); |